Gal Lipkin et al v. Sacha Bolton
| Gal Lipkin and Paul Ratajczak |
| Sacha Bolton and DOES 1 to 50 |
| 2:2023cv01552 |
| March 1, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jean P Rosenbluth |
| Josephine L Staton |
| Marine |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING ORDER by Judge Josephine L. Staton. A Scheduling Conference is set for Friday, 6/16/2023 at 10:30 a.m. See attached Order for details. (vdr)
|
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Sacha Bolton, identifying Sacha Bolton, Gal Lipkin and Paul Ratajczak. (Green, Carla) |
| Filing 13 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant Sacha Bolton.(Attorney Carla A Green added to party Sacha Bolton(pty:dft))(Green, Carla) |
| Filing 12 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant Sacha Bolton. (lom) |
| Filing 11 CV-30 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs Gal Lipkin, Paul Ratajczak, identifying Sacha Bolton, Gal Lipkin, Paul Ratajczak. (Roque, Sabrina) |
| Filing 10 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Notice of Deficiency in Request to Issue Summons, #9 filed by Plaintiffs Gal Lipkin, Paul Ratajczak. (Roque, Sabrina) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons. The following error(s) was found: The Summons Requests was filed under the incorrect event. The correct event is: Civil Events > Service Documents > Service/Waivers of Summons and Complaints > Summons Request. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (jtil) |
|
Filing 8
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Josephine L. Staton. (kmh)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. Other error(s) with document(s): Please utilize CM/ECF resources such as the search tool to locate the appropriate events for filing. No further action is required unless directed by the Court. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (jtil) |
| Filing 3 Notice Summons filed by attorney Gal Lipkin, Paul Ratajczak. Summons (Roque, Sabrina) |
| Filing 2 PETITION Civ 71 Coversheet with filing fee previously paid (402.00 paid on 03/01/2023, receipt number 34881862), filed by attorney Gal Lipkin, Paul Ratajczak.(Roque, Sabrina) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-34881862 - Fee: $402, filed by attorney Gal Lipkin, Paul Ratajczak. (Attorney Sabrina L Roque added to party Gal Lipkin(pty:bkmov), Attorney Sabrina L Roque added to party Paul Ratajczak(pty:bkmov))(Roque, Sabrina) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
