Abrigo Castro v. Ford Motor Company
| Jose I. Abrigo Castro |
| FORD MOTOR COMPANY and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive |
| 2:2023cv01891 |
| March 14, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha |
| Rozella A Oliver |
| Prop. Damage Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 25 Receipt of Remand by Los Angeles County Superior Court, Glendale on 10/18/2023. (lc) |
| Filing 24 TRANSMITTAL of documents to LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, GLENDALE, NO. 23GDCV00313. (lc) |
Filing 23
ORDER REMANDING ACTION FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha : The Court remands action to Los Angeles County Superior Court, Glendale, Case number 23GDCV00313. All dates and deadlines in this court are VACATED. The clerk of the court shall close the action administratively. Case Terminated. Made JS-6 (lc)
|
| Filing 22 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Jose I. Abrigo Castroto Order,,, #20 (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Allen Amarkarian, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit 5)(Amarkarian, Allen) |
| Filing 21 RESPONSE filed by Defendant Ford Motor Companyto Order,,, #20 (Attachments: #1 Declaration in support of Response to OSC)(Proudfoot, Matthew) |
|
Filing 20
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE REMANDED FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. The parties are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing only, within fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order, why this action should not be remanded for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because the amount in controversy does not exceed the jurisdictional threshold. The parties are encouraged to submit evidence and/or judicially noticeable facts in response to the court's Order. Responses shall be limited to ten (10) pages in length. The parties should consider this Order to be a two-pronged inquiry into the facial and factual sufficiency of Defendant's demonstration of jurisdiction. See order for details. (lom)
|
|
Filing 19
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: REQUEST OF PLAINTIFF JOSE I. CASTRO FOR REMOTE APPEARANCE (DKT. #12 ) ), AND REQUEST OF DEFENDANT FORD MOTOR COMPANY FOR REMOTE APPEARANCE (DKT. #14 ): In light of the scheduling conference being vacated (Dkt. 16 ), the Requests are denied as MOOT. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (tf) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
|
Filing 18
ORDER RE: SCHEDULE OF PRETRIAL AND TRIAL DATES, TRIAL REQUIREMENTS, ANDCONDUCT OF ATTORNEYS AND PARTIES by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: Final Pretrial Conference set for 6/7/2024 01:00 PM ; Jury Trial set for 6/25/2024 08:30 AM ; Motion in Limine set for hearing on 6/7/2024 at 01:00 PM (SEE DOCUMENT FOR ALL SPECIFIED DEADLINES). (lc)
|
|
Filing 17
ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 3 by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. Case ordered to a private mediator based upon a stipulation of the parties or by the court order. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than 05/03/2024. (tf)
|
| Filing 16 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: The court has reviewed the Joint Rule 26(f) Report submitted by the parties, and determines that an in-person Scheduling Conference is unnecessary. Accordingly, the court VACATES the May 12, 2023, Scheduling Conference. Order re Jury/Court Trial to issue. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (tf) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 15 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: REQUEST for Leave of Matthew M. Proudfoot to Appear for Scheduling Conference Telephonically #14 . The following error(s) was/were found: Hearing information is missing, incorrect, or untimely. Filer erroneously set the Request on Judge's Motion calendar for same date as the scheduling conference May 12, 2023 1:00 PM. No hearing date is required for the request format. Other error(s) with document(s): NOTE: Clerk has TERMED ONLY the erroneous hearing and that the REQUEST REMAINS PENDING the Judge's ruling.. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc) |
| Filing 14 REQUEST for Leave of Matthew M. Proudfoot to Appear for Scheduling Conference Telephonically filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. Request set for hearing on 5/12/2023 at 01:00 PM before Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Proudfoot, Matthew) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: REQUEST for Leave of Allen Amarkarian, Esq. to Appear for Remote Appearance #12 . The following error(s) was/were found: Hearing information is missing, incorrect, or untimely. Filer erroneously set the Request on Judge's Motion calendar for same date as the scheduling conference May 12, 2023 1:00 PM. No hearing date is required for the request format. Other error(s) with document(s): NOTE: Clerk has TERMED ONLY the erroneous hearing and that the REQUEST REMAINS PENDING the Judge's ruling. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc) |
| Filing 12 REQUEST for Leave of Allen Amarkarian, Esq. to Appear for Remote Appearance filed by plaintiff Jose I. Abrigo Castro. Request set for hearing on 5/12/2023 at 01:00 PM before Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Plaintiff's Request to Appear Remotely) (Jacobson, Kevin) |
| Filing 11 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 4 days, filed by Plaintiff Jose I. Abrigo Castro.. (Amarkarian, Allen) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. Scheduling Conference set for 5/12/2023 at 01:00 PM before Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (tf)
|
|
Filing 9
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (tf)
|
| Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha and Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (jtil) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company in Los Angeles Superior Court on 3/10/2023, attached as Exhibit 2. (jtil) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Jose I. Abrigo Castro in Los Angeles Superior Court on 2/16/2023, attached as Exhibit 1. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY, identifying Ford Motor Company. (Proudfoot, Matthew) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Matthew M Proudfoot on behalf of Defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY (Proudfoot, Matthew) |
| Filing 3 DECLARATION of Matthew M. Proudfoot re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY. (Proudfoot, Matthew) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY. (Proudfoot, Matthew) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles, case number 232GDCV00313 Receipt No: ACACDC-34953105 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Summons & Complaint - State Court, #2 Answer to Complaint - State Court) (Attorney Matthew M Proudfoot added to party FORD MOTOR COMPANY(pty:dft))(Proudfoot, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
