The Body Firm, LLC v. JAMRM, LLC et al
| The Body Firm, LLC |
| JAMRM, LLC doing business as Revision Skincare, Does 1-10, inclusive, and JAMRM, LLC Texas limited liability company doing business as Revision Skincare |
| 2:2023cv01920 |
| March 15, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Margo A Rocconi |
| Otis D Wright |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1121 Trademark Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: Defendant JAMRM, LLC's Stipulation for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply #16 . The following error(s) was/were found: Proposed document was not submitted or was not submitted as a separate attachment. Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Stipulation: Extending time to answer (30 days or LESS). The filing was reviewed for extending time to answer less than 30 days. The incorrect docket event used did NOT extend time to answer and requires a proposed order. The cited correct event would have prompted filer to set new answer due date. Other error(s) with document(s): Note: To assist in a search for correct events, please use the "SEARCH" option for a "key word" to narrow the selection process. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc) |
| Filing 16 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Response as to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant JAMRM, LLC.(Heffner, James) |
| Filing 15 Corporate Disclosure Statement and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant JAMRM, LLC, identifying Gryphon Revision Operations, LLC - Affiliate; RVGD Aggregator LP - Affiliate; RVGD Rollco LLC - Affiliate; RVGD Topco LP - Affiliate; RVGD GP LLC - Affiliate; RVGD Intermediate LP - Affiliate; RVGD Intermediate GP LLC - Affiliate; Revision Parent LLC - Affiliate; Revision Holdco LLC - Affiliate; Revision Buyer LLC - Affiliate; Revision Holdings LLC - Direct Parent; Revision, LLC - Affiliate; JAMRM, LLC - Named Defendant; Goodier Parent LLC - Affiliate; Goodier Holdco LLC - Affiliate; Goodier Buyer LLC - Affiliate; Goodier Holdings LLC - Affiliate; Goodier Cosmetics, LLC - Affiliate. (Heffner, James) |
| Filing 14 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney James E Heffner counsel for Defendant JAMRM, LLC. Adding James E. Heffner as counsel of record for Defendant JAMRM, LLC d/b/a REVISION SKINCARE for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant JAMRM, LLC d/b/a REVISION SKINCARE. (Attorney James E Heffner added to party JAMRM, LLC(pty:dft))(Heffner, James) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Plaintiff The Body Firm, LLC. correcting Waiver of Service Executed, #12 (Correcting Plaintiff's Counsel name) (Cislo, Daniel) |
| Filing 12 Notice of Filing of WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiff The Body Firm, LLC. upon JAMRM, LLC waiver sent by Plaintiff on 3/15/2023, answer due 5/15/2023. Waiver of Service signed by Sherry L. Rollo, Esq. Attorney. (Cislo, Daniel) |
Filing 11
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY- No mandatory chambers copies required, EXCEPT FOR EXCEPT FOR motions for summary judgment and any other evidence-heavy motions. The Court's Electronic Document Submission System (EDSS) allows people without lawyers who have pending cases in the US District Court for the Central District of California to submit documents electronically to the Clerk's Office The parties may consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge appearing on the voluntary consent list. PLEASE refer to Local Rule 79-5 for the submission of CIVIL ONLY SEALED DOCUMENTS. CRIMINAL SEALED DOCUMENTS will remain the same. Please refer to Court's Website and Judge's procedures for information as applicable. (lc)
|
| Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant JAMRM, LLC. (lh) |
| Filing 9 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi. (lh) |
| Filing 6 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff The Body Firm, LLC. (Cislo, Daniel) |
| Filing 5 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by The Body Firm, LLC. (Cislo, Daniel) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Plaintiff The Body Firm, LLC. (Cislo, Daniel) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATION and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff The Body Firm, LLC, identifying The Body Firm, LLC, Guthy-Renker, LLC, an affiliated company of Plaintiff, and JAMRM, LLC d/b/a Revision Skincare. (Cislo, Daniel) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff The Body Firm, LLC. (Cislo, Daniel) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-34958626 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff The Body Firm, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C) (Attorney Daniel Miles Cislo added to party The Body Firm, LLC(pty:pla))(Cislo, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
