Everett Lee Cox v. Pfiffer
| Everett Lee Cox |
| Pfiffer |
| 2:2023cv02018 |
| March 16, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dale S Fischer |
| Michael R Wilner |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS ORDER RE: SCREENING OF HABEAS PETITION by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. Pursuant to the rules governing federal habeas actions, the Court conducted a preliminary review of Petitioner's habeas filing. Petitioner is ordered to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for a variety of procedural reasons outlined below. It is therefore ORDERED that Petitioner will file a memorandum by or before June 16, 2023, not to exceed 5 pages showing good cause why the case should not be dismissed. Alternatively, if Petitioner acknowledges that he is not entitled to further federal review of his conviction or sentence, he may voluntarily dismiss the action without consequence. See minute order for details. (Attachments: #1 Part 1) (lom)
|
| Filing 6 FINANCIAL ENTRY: Received $5.00 from Everett Lee Cox. Re: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254) #1 . Receipt number #1408. (jo) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER ON REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (HABEAS) #3 by Judge Dale S. Fischer. Ruling on the Request is POSTPONED for 30 days so that Petitioner may provide additional information. See order for specifics. (lom)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Dale S. Fischer and referred to Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (sh) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Petitioner Everett Lee Cox. (sh) |
| Filing 2 ELECTION REGARDING CONSENT to Proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge Declined, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636c filed by Petitioner Everett Lee Cox. The Petitioner does not consent. (sh) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254) Case assigned to Judge Dale S. Fischer and referred to Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner.(Filing fee $ 5 FEE DUE), filed by Petitioner Everett Lee Cox. (sh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Everett Lee Cox v. Pfiffer | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Everett Lee Cox | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Pfiffer | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
