Posh Peanut v. Anna Hernandez et al
Posh Peanut and Posh Peanut, Inc. |
Anna Hernandez, Anna Kozaczka, Charlie's Project Inc., Charlie's Project Kids LLC, Charlie's Project Inc. formerly doing business as Charlie's Project Inc. and DOES 1-10, inclusive |
2:2023cv02082 |
March 20, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Michael R Wilner |
Stephen V Wilson |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 Waiver of Service of Summons WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by plaintiff Posh Peanut, Inc.. upon Charlie's Project Kids LLC waiver sent by Plaintiff on 4/26/2023, answer due 6/26/2023. Waiver of Service signed by Brianna N. Logan. (Beral, Arash) |
Filing 15 Waiver of Service of Summons WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by plaintiff Posh Peanut, Inc.. upon Charlie's Project Inc. waiver sent by Plaintiff on 4/26/2023, answer due 6/26/2023. Waiver of Service signed by Brianna N. Logan. (Beral, Arash) |
Filing 14 Waiver of Service of Summons WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by plaintiff Posh Peanut, Inc.. upon Anna Hernandez waiver sent by Plaintiff on 4/26/2023, answer due 6/26/2023. Waiver of Service signed by Brianna N. Logan. (Beral, Arash) |
Filing 13 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: Notice of Appearance #12 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Notice of Appearance of Withdrawal of Counsel G123.. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ak) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Todd Matthew Malynn on behalf of Plaintiff Posh Peanut, Inc. (Malynn, Todd) |
Filing 11 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendants Charlie's Project Inc., Charlie's Project Kids LLC, Anna Hernandez. (Attachments: #1 Charlies Project Kids LLC, #2 AHernandez) (jtil) |
Filing 10 CIVIL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (vdr) |
Filing 9 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stephen V. Wilson and Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (jtil) |
Filing 6 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Posh Peanut. (Malynn, Todd) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Posh Peanut, (Malynn, Todd) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Posh Peanut. (Malynn, Todd) |
Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Posh Peanut. (Malynn, Todd) |
Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Posh Peanut. (Malynn, Todd) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-34988289 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Posh Peanut. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (Attorney Todd Matthew Malynn added to party Posh Peanut(pty:pla))(Malynn, Todd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.