Leg Avenue, Inc. v. Jacobson Hat Company Inc. et al
Leg Avenue, Inc. and Leg Avenue Inc. |
Jacobson Hat Company, Inc. and Does 1-10, inclusive |
2:2023cv02127 |
March 21, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Sherilyn Peace Garnett |
Alka Sagar |
Copyright |
17 U.S.C. ยง 501 Copyright Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett.The Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff(s) to show cause, in writing, on or before May 30, 2023, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. (iv) |
Filing 15 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Jacobson Hat Company, Inc. answer now due 5/10/2023, re Summons Issued (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #8 filed by Plaintiff Leg Avenue Inc..(Susman, Jordan) |
Filing 14 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: Proof of Service #13 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 11-3.8 title page is missing, incomplete, or incorrect. Case number missing. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (iv) |
Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Leg Avenue Inc., upon Defendant Jacobson Hat Company, Inc. served on 3/29/2023, answer due 5/3/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Patricia Stee, Controller in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Susman, Jordan) |
Filing 12 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Jacobson Hat Company, Inc. answer now due 5/3/2023, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Leg Avenue Inc..(Susman, Jordan) |
Filing 11 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by Leg Avenue Inc.. (Susman, Jordan) |
Filing 10 STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett. (pg) |
Filing 9 NOTICE TO COUNSEL RE: Copyright, Patent and Trademark Reporting Requirements. Counsel shall file the appropriate AO-120 and/or AO-121 form with the Clerk within 10 days. (sh) |
Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Jacobson Hat Company, Inc.. (sh) |
Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (sh) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Leg Avenue, Inc., identifying Leg Avenue, Inc.; Jacobson Hat Company, Inc.. (Susman, Jordan) |
Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Leg Avenue, Inc.. (Susman, Jordan) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Leg Avenue, Inc.. (Susman, Jordan) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-34997733 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Leg Avenue, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2) (Attorney Jordan David Susman added to party Leg Avenue, Inc.(pty:pla))(Susman, Jordan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.