Venice Marie Flores-Washington v. California Department of Public Health Vital Records et al
| Ex-Parte Trustee Venice For Alias Merchant Surname Flores-Washington and Venice Marie Flores-Washington |
| California Department of Public Health Vital Records, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco and State of California |
| 2:2023cv02166 |
| March 23, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Pedro V Castillo |
| John D Early |
| John F Walter |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 35
MINUTES (In Chambers): Order Denying Application to File Case Under Seal by Magistrate Judge John D. Early: denying #25 APPLICATION to File Case Under Seal. (see document for details) (hr)
|
|
Filing 34
MINUTE (In Chambers): Order Vacating Hearing and Taking Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 18) Under Submission by Magistrate Judge John D. Early, re: MOTION to Dismiss #18 . On May 19, 2023, Judge Walter vacated the original referral order in this case and issued a new referral to the newly assigned magistrate judge for a Report and Recommendation under General Order 05-07. See Dkt. 33. As such, the newly assigned magistrate judge will consider the Motion and the currently set hearing is hereby vacated. (see document for further details) (hr)
|
|
Filing 33
ORDER VACATING REFERENCE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge John F. Walter. Reference of discovery to Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo is vacated. Case transferred to the calendar of Magistrate Judge John D. Early for Report and Recommendation. Case number now reads as 2:23-cv-02166 JFW(JDE). (rn)
|
| Filing 32 MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON DEFENDANTS CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND STATE OF CALIFORNIA'S MOTION TO DISMISS [filed 4/18/2023; Docket No. #18 ] before Judge John F. Walter. The Court continues the hearing on Defendants California Department of Public Health and State of California's Motion to Dismiss filed on April 18, 2023, currently on calendar for May 22, 2023, to June 12, 2023 at 1:30 p.m. (iv) |
| Filing 31 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Venice Marie Flores-Washington, re Affidavit #30 served on 5/8/2023. (iv) |
| Filing 30 AFFIDAVIT OF RESPONSE TO OPPOSE AND DENY MOTION TO DISMISS filed by Plaintiff Venice Marie Flores-Washington. (iv) |
| Filing 29 REPLY in Support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Complaint #18 filed by Defendant California Department of Public Health Vital Records. (Schreiber, Mark) |
| Filing 28 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Upon further review, the name of the Plaintiff was added incorrectly. The name of the Plaintiff has been corrected Re: Complaint - (Discovery), #1 (car) |
| Filing 27 Text Entry Order RE attached documents submitted by EDSS filing on April 25, 2023: 1) Document: For the Record; 2) Document: Full Faith_Redacted; 3) Document: Fourteenth Amendment. The filings do not adhere to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Local Rules of the Court, and the Individual Rules of the Hon. John F. Walter and the Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo and therefor will not be accepted for filing. As stated in the Courts Self Representation Order #18 , when you elect to proceed pro se, you are on your own and become personally responsible for litigating your action in accordance with the rules. Practice in the federal courts is governed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. You must become familiar with these rules. You will be held to the same standards as a lawyer as far as complying with the court procedures and the rules and regulations of the court system. The Court highly recommends that the Plaintiff filing in Pro Se contact the Pro Se Clinic for guidance http://prose.cacd.uscourts.gov/los-angeles THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (sr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/26/2023: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit) (sr). |
| Filing 26 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Ex-Parte Trustee Venice For Alias Merchant Surname Flores-Washington, re APPLICATION #25 served on 4/21/2023. (iv) |
| Filing 25 APPLICATION to Seal Case filed by Plaintiff Ex-Parte Trustee Venice For Alias Merchant Surname Flores-Washington. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (iv) |
|
Filing 24
ORDER by Judge John F. Walter: Granting #23 APPLICATION for Pro Se Electronic Filing. The applicant must register to use the Courts CM/ECF System within five (5) days of being served with this order. Registration information is available at the Pro Se Litigant E-Filing web page located on the Courts website. Upon registering, the applicant will receive a CM/ECF login and password that will allow him/her to file non-sealed documents electronically in this case only. Any documents being submitted under seal must be manually filed with the Clerk. (iv)
|
| Filing 23 APPLICATION for Pro Se Litigant to electronically file documents in a specific case filed by Plaintiff Ex-Parte Trustee Venice For Alias Merchant Surname Flores-Washington. (iv) |
| Filing 22 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Ex-Parte Trustee Venice For Alias Merchant Surname Flores-Washington, re Statement #21 served on 4/20/2023. (iv) |
| Filing 21 STATEMENT TO SHOW CAUSE AND ENTITLEMENT filed by Plaintiff Ex-Parte Trustee Venice For Alias Merchant Surname Flores-Washington. (iv) |
| Filing 20 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: Motion to Dismiss #18 . The following error(s) was/were found: Hearing information is missing, incorrect, or untimely. Filer bypassed setting hearing screen. Pleading lists date of May 22, 2023 at 1:30 p.m. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (iv) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE OF LODGING filed re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Complaint #18 (Schreiber, Mark) |
| Filing 18 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Complaint filed by Defendants California Department of Public Health Vital Records. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum) (Schreiber, Mark) |
| Filing 17 PROOF OF SERVICE RE STANDING ORDER by mail on 4/13/23 #9 filed by Plaintiff Ex-Parte Trustee Venice For Alias Merchant Surname Flores-Washington. (lom) |
| Filing 16 COVER SHEET FOR WARRANT OF ATTORNEY delivered to Rob Bonta, Richard T Waldo, Mark Schreiber on 4/11/23 #13 filed by Plaintiff Ex-Parte Trustee Venice For Alias Merchant Surname Flores-Washington. (lom) |
| Filing 15 STATEMENT RE: DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS filed by Defendant California Department of Public Health Vital Records (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Lead Counsel)(Schreiber, Mark) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Filed Document RE: Warranty of Attorney #13 . The following error(s) was/were found: The document was not sign by the other side judicial determination is required. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lom) |
| Filing 13 WARRANTY OF ATTORNEY filed by Plaintiff Ex-Parte Trustee Venice For Alias Merchant Surname Flores-Washington. (lom) |
|
Filing 12
MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED by Judge John F. Walter. Plaintiff is hereby ordered to show cause, in writing, no later than April 21, 2023, why this action should not be dismissed. No oral argument on this matter will be heard unless otherwise ordered by the Court. (iv)
|
|
Filing 10
SELF-REPRESENTATION ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. (iv)
|
|
Filing 9
STANDING ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge John F. Walter. (iv)
|
| Filing 8 CORRECTED NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John F. Walter and Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. (car) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error Re: Notice of Assignment to United States Judges(CV-18) form #6 was issued with the incorrect case number. Docket item 6 should be disregarded. A corrected form will be issued. (car) |
| Filing 6 [NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR ISSUED ON 3/28/2023, SEE ITEM #7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha and Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (car) Modified on 3/28/2023 (car). |
| Filing 5 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 as to Defendant Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. (car) |
| Filing 4 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 as to Defendant State of California. (car) |
| Filing 3 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 as to Defendant California Department of Public Health Vital Records. (car) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Ex-Parte Trustee Venice For Alias Merchant Surname Flores-Washington, (car) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendants Case assigned to Judge John F. Walter for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo.(Filing fee $ 402 PAID), filed by Plaintiff Ex-Parte Trustee Venice For Alias Merchant Surname Flores-Washington. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (car) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
