David Taran v. Mercedes Benz USA, LLC et al
| David Taran |
| Mercedes Benz USA, LLC and Does 1-75, inclusive |
| 2:2023cv02195 |
| March 23, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha |
| Charles F Eick |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: Having considered the Notice of Settlement #11 the court hereby ORDERS: 1. All deadlines governing this action are VACATED. 2. The court DISMISSES the action without prejudice. The court retains jurisdiction to vacate this Order and to reopen the action within 60 days from the date of this Order. 3. This Order does not preclude the filing of a stipulation of dismissal with prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41, which does not require approval of the court. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lc)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Settlement filed by Plaintiff David Taran. (Cirlin, Jason) |
|
Filing 10
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: On March 28, 2023, the court set the Scheduling Conference for May 26, 2023. (Dkt. #8 ). The parties were required to file a Joint Report at least fourteen days prior to the Scheduling Conference, by May 12, 2023. Id. The parties failed to file a Joint Report. Counsel shall file the report no later than May 19, 2023. The Scheduling Conference is continued to June 2, 2023 at 1:00 PM. The court reminds counsel to adhere to its deadlines. Any future failure to do so may result in the imposition of sanctions.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (tf) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 9 DEMAND for Jury Trial filed by Defendant Mercedes Benz USA, LLC.. (Said, Christine) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. Scheduling Conference set for 5/26/2023 at 01:00 PM before Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (tf)
|
|
Filing 7
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (tf)
|
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (car) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1-75, Mercedes Benz USA, LLC. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff David Taran. Filed in State Court on 2/16/2023 Submitted with Attachment 2 Exhibit A to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendants Mercedes Benz USA, LLC. Filed in State Court on 3/21/2023 Submitted with Attachment 3 Exhibit B to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Mercedes Benz USA, LLC, identifying Mercedes-Benz North America Corporation. (Said, Christine) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Mercedes Benz USA, LLC. (Said, Christine) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 23VECV00737 Receipt No: ACACDC-35014521 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Mercedes Benz USA, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Christine Said, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit Exhibit B) (Attorney Christine Said added to party Mercedes Benz USA, LLC(pty:dft))(Said, Christine) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
