Ranch Inn MHP LLC v. Martin Estrada Bueno
Ranch Inn MHP LLC |
Martin Estrada Bueno and DOES 1 to 10 |
Nasik Hav'nikar El and Tanya Smith |
2:2023cv02212 |
March 24, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Percy Anderson |
Pedro V Castillo |
Rent Lease & Ejectment |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles. (aco) |
Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. (jtil) |
![]() |
Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Defendant/Interested Party Nasik Hav'nikar El. (jtil) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants/IP Martin Estrada Bueno, Nasik Hav'nikar El, and Tanya Smith. (jtil) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Martin Estrada Bueno from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 22AVUD01315 with copy of summons and complaint. Case assigned to Judge Percy Anderson, Discovery to Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. (Attachments: #1 CV71) (jtil) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.