Downs v. Los Angeles Sheriffs Department
| Ladarius Downs and Ladarious Downs |
| Los Angeles Sheriffs Department, Nolasco, Hernandez, Valle, Anderson, Garcia, John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3, John Doe 4, John Doe 6, John Doe 7, John Doe 8, John Doe 9, John Doe 10, John Doe 11, Jane Doe 1, John Doe 12, John Doe 13, John Doe 14 and Jane Doe 3 |
| Jane Doe 2 |
| 2:2023cv02271 |
| March 27, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Percy Anderson |
| Pedro V Castillo |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 FINANCIAL ENTRY: Received $0.28 initial partial filing fee from plaintiff Ladarius Downs on 05/09/2023, receipt number 2152, re: Order on Request for Leave to Proceed without Prepayment of Filing Fees (CV60P),, #4 . THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (dl) |
| Filing 7 JUDGMENT by Judge Percy Anderson. Pursuant to the Court's May 9, 2023 Minute Order dismissing this action for failure to prosecute and/or comply with a court order, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this action is dismissed without prejudice. RE: MINUTES IN CHAMBERS-COURT ORDER, #6 . (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (aco) |
Filing 6
MINUTES IN CHAMBERS-COURT ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. The Court warned Plaintiff that this action may be dismissed if the initial partial payment was not received by the Court within 30 days. More than 30 days have now passed and the Court has not received Plaintiff's initial partial payment. Accordingly, this action is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for Plaintiff's failure to prosecute and/or comply with the Court's Order. (See document for further details). (aco)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Change of Address to Kern Valley State Prison, P.O. Box 5101, Delano, CA 93216 and Request for Confirmation. Filed by Plaintiff Ladarius Downs. (hr) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND by Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. The Complaint is dismissed with leave to amend. If Plaintiff still wishes to pursue this action, he must file a First Amended Complaint within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order. (see document for further details) (Attachments: #1 Blank Civil Rights Complaint Form) (hr)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and referred to Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. (jtil) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER ON REQUEST TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FILING FEES (PRISONER NON-HABEAS CASE) by Judge Percy Anderson. The Request is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that the prisoner-plaintiff owes the Court the initial filing fee of $350.00. An initial partial filing fee of $0.28 must be paid within 30 days of the date of this order. Thereafter, monthly payments shall be forwarded to the Court in accordance with this order.; granting #2 REQUEST for Leave to Proceed without Prepayment of Filing Fee. (aco)
|
| Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Ladarius Downs. (jtil) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Ladarius Downs against Defendants All Defendants, pursuant to 42 USC 1983. Case assigned to Judge Percy Anderson and referred to Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. (jtil) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
