Allisyn Shlank v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Allisyn Shlank |
The Prudential Insurance Company of America |
2:2023cv02291 |
March 28, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Pedro V Castillo |
Consuelo B Marshall |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to The Prudential Insurance Company of America answer now due 5/31/2023, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant The Prudential Insurance Company of America.(Attorney Jason A James added to party The Prudential Insurance Company of America(pty:dft))(James, Jason) |
Filing 10 NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Plaintiff Allisyn Shlank. correcting Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days), #9 (Attachments: #1 Unredacted Document)(Grabarsky, Susan) |
Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Allisyn Shlank, upon Defendant The Prudential Insurance Company of America served on 4/10/2023, answer due 5/1/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Sarai Marin, Intake Specialist of CT Corporation Agent for Process in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Grabarsky, Susan) |
Filing 8 STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. It controls this case and may differ in some respects from the Local Rules.(See order for details) (ys) |
Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant The Prudential Insurance Company of America. (jtil) |
Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Consuelo B. Marshall and Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. (jtil) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Allisyn Shlank. (Grabarsky, Susan) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Allisyn Shlank. (Grabarsky, Susan) |
Filing 2 Certification & NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Allisyn Shlank, (Grabarsky, Susan) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-35039087 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Allisyn Shlank. (Attorney Susan B Grabarsky added to party Allisyn Shlank(pty:pla))(Grabarsky, Susan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Allisyn Shlank v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Allisyn Shlank | |
Represented By: | Susan B Grabarsky |
Represented By: | Phillip S Bather |
Represented By: | Frank N Darras |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: The Prudential Insurance Company of America | |
Represented By: | Jason A James |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.