Robert Deutsch v. Anna Deutsch Trust dated September 3, 1991 et al
Plaintiff: Robert Deutsch
Defendant: Anna Deutsch Trust dated September 3, 1991, Alexandra Leichter, Robert Leichter, David Winkler and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Case Number: 2:2023cv02316
Filed: March 29, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Office: Western Division - Los Angeles Office
Presiding Judge: Percy Anderson
Referring Judge: Maria A Audero
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 23, 2023 Filing 41 NOTICE OF APPEAL to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals filed by Plaintiff Robert Deutsch. Appeal of Order Dismissing Case, #39 , Judgment, #40 . (Appeal Fee - $505 Fee Paid, Receipt No. BCACDC-35365457.) (Brar, Vikram)
April 25, 2023 Filing 40 JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL by Judge Percy Anderson. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff's action is dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (See document for further details). RE: MINUTES IN CHAMBERS - COURT ORDER, #39 . (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (aco)
April 25, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 39 MINUTES IN CHAMBERS - COURT ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. For all of the foregoing reasons, the Court concludes that this action presents claims within the probate exception to the Court's subject matter jurisdiction. The Court therefore dismisses this action without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The Court will issue a Judgment consistent with this Order. (See document for further details). (aco)
April 24, 2023 Filing 38 REPLY filed by Plaintiff Robert Deutsch to Order to Show Cause,, #22 (Brar, Vikram)
April 24, 2023 Filing 37 First REQUEST to Substitute attorney Neal B. Jannol in place of attorney William D. Black filed by defendant Robert Leichter. (Attorney Neal B Jannol added to party Robert Leichter(pty:dft)) (Jannol, Neal)
April 24, 2023 Filing 36 First REQUEST to Substitute attorney Neal B. Jannol in place of attorney William D. Black filed by defendant Alexandra Leichter. (Attorney Neal B Jannol added to party Alexandra Leichter(pty:dft)) (Jannol, Neal)
April 24, 2023 Filing 35 First REQUEST to Substitute attorney Neal B. Jannol in place of attorney William D. Black filed by DEFENDANT David Winkler. (Attorney Neal B Jannol added to party David Winkler(pty:dft)) (Jannol, Neal)
April 24, 2023 Filing 34 RESPONSE filed by Defendant Anna Deutsch Trust dated September 3, 1991 (Jannol, Neal)
April 21, 2023 Filing 33 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Robert Deutschto Order to Show Cause,, #22 (Brar, Vikram)
April 17, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER ON APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY TO APPEAR IN A SPECIFIC CASE PRO HAC VICE by Judge Percy Anderson. APPLICATION of Attorney Joel N. Reissner to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Robert Deutsch, designating Vikram Brar as local counsel.; GRANTING #30 Non-Resident Attorney Joel N. Reissner. (aco)
April 17, 2023 Filing 31 NOTICE OF LODGING filed re APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Joel N. Reissner to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Robert Deutsch (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500.00 Previously Paid on 4/11/2023, Receipt No. BCACDC-35117257) #30 (Brar, Vikram)
April 17, 2023 Filing 30 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Joel N. Reissner to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Robert Deutsch (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500.00 Previously Paid on 4/11/2023, Receipt No. BCACDC-35117257) filed by Plaintiff Robert Deutsch. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (Proposed) Order on Application of Non-Resident Attorney to Appear in a Specific Case Pro Hac Vice) (Brar, Vikram)
April 12, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson Denying #27 Non-Resident Attorney Joel N Reissner APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Robert Deutsch because Electronic signatures are not permitted. (bm)
April 12, 2023 Filing 28 NOTICE OF LODGING filed re APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Joel N. Reissner to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Robert Deutsch (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. BCACDC-35117257) APPLICATION for Order #27 (Brar, Vikram)
April 11, 2023 Filing 27 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Joel N. Reissner to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Robert Deutsch (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. BCACDC-35117257), APPLICATION for Order filed by Plaintiff Robert Deutsch. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (Proposed) Order on Application of Non-Resident Attorney to Appear in a Specific Case Pro Hac Vice) (Attorney Vikram Brar added to party Robert Deutsch(pty:pla)) (Brar, Vikram)
April 3, 2023 Filing 26 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney William D Black. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. (car)
April 3, 2023 Filing 25 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Joel Reissner. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. (car)
April 3, 2023 Filing 24 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car)
April 3, 2023 Filing 23 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car)
April 3, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 22 MINUTES IN CHAMBERS-ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Percy Anderson. The Court therefore orders the parties to show cause in writing why this action should not be dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction as a result of application of the probate exception to the Court's subject matter jurisdiction. The parties' responses to this Order to Show Cause shall be filed by no later than April 24, 2023. Failure to file an adequate response to this Order to Show Cause by the deadline may, without further warning, result in the dismissal of this action without prejudice. (See document for further details). (aco)
April 3, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 21 STANDING ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Percy Anderson. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS). (aco)
April 3, 2023 Filing 20 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. (car)
April 3, 2023 Filing 19 NOTICE OF RECEIPT OF CASE TRANSFERRED IN: Formerly Case Number: 3:22-cv-08234-DLR, from U.S. District Court DISTRICT OF ARIZONA (Prescott Division). The above-referenced case has been transferred to this district and assigned the above civil case number 2:23-cv-02316-PA-MAAx. (car)
April 3, 2023 Filing 18 ORIGINAL file, certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received from Arizona
March 29, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER DISMISSING CASE: Defendants' motion to transfer venue (Doc. #14 ) is granted. The Clerk of Court is directed to transfer this action to the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 3/29/2023. (KJ) [Transferred from Arizona on 4/3/2023.]
March 27, 2023 Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Neal B Jannol on behalf of Defendant Anna Deutsch Trust dated September 3, 1991. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) [Transferred from Arizona on 4/3/2023.]
February 27, 2023 Filing 16 REPLY to Response to Motion re: #14 MOTION to Change Venue/Transfer Case to Central District of California filed by Anna Deutsch Trust dated September 3, 1991. (Black, William) [Transferred from Arizona on 4/3/2023.]
February 21, 2023 Filing 15 RESPONSE in Opposition re: #14 MOTION to Change Venue/Transfer Case to Central District of California filed by Robert Deutsch. (Reissner, Joel) [Transferred from Arizona on 4/3/2023.]
February 6, 2023 Filing 14 MOTION to Change Venue/Transfer Case to Central District of California by Anna Deutsch Trust dated September 3, 1991. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities, #2 Declaration of William D. Black, #3 Exhibits 1-5 to Declaration of William D. Black, #4 Exhibits 6-8 to Declaration of William D. Black, #5 Proposed Order, #6 Proof of Service)(Black, William) [Transferred from Arizona on 4/3/2023.]
January 25, 2023 Filing 13 NOTICE of Filing Amended Pleading pursuant to LRCiv 15.1(b) by Robert Deutsch . (Reissner, Joel) [Transferred from Arizona on 4/3/2023.]
January 24, 2023 Filing 12 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #11 Amended Complaint filed by Robert Deutsch. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 15.1(b) - The amending party must file a separate notice of filing the amended pleading. FOLLOW-UP ACTION REQUIRED: Please use event Notice of Filing - Amended Pleading (LRCiv 15.1(b)) and attach a copy of the amended pleading that indicates in what respect it differs from the pleading which it amends, by bracketing or striking through the text that was deleted and underlining the text that was added. Deficiency must be corrected within one business day of this notice. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (KJ) [Transferred from Arizona on 4/3/2023.]
January 23, 2023 Filing 11 AMENDED COMPLAINT First against All Defendants filed by Robert Deutsch.(Reissner, Joel) [Transferred from Arizona on 4/3/2023.]
January 10, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 *ORDER: IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the parties' #9 Amended Stipulation, the deadline for Defendants Anna Deutsch Trust dated September 3, 1991, Alexandra Leichter, Robert Leichter, and David Winkler to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint is extended to and including 1/30/2023. Ordered by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 1/10/2023. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MMO) *NEF regenerated to Plaintiff's counsel only on 1/10/2023 (did not receive initial NEF) (NKS). [Transferred from Arizona on 4/3/2023.]
January 9, 2023 Filing 9 AMENDED STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT by Anna Deutsch Trust dated September 3, 1991. (Black, William) Modified on 1/10/2023 (KJ). [Transferred from Arizona on 4/3/2023.]
January 9, 2023 Filing 8 AMENDED by (Doc. #9 ) STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT by Anna Deutsch Trust dated September 3, 1991. (Black, William) *Modified docket text on 1/10/2023 (KJ). [Transferred from Arizona on 4/3/2023.]
January 9, 2023 Filing 7 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: William Black appearing for Anna Deutsch Trust dated September 3, 1991. (Black, William) Modified on 1/10/2023 (KJ). [Transferred from Arizona on 4/3/2023.]
December 22, 2022 Filing 6 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Robert Deutsch: Declaration of Service re: Order (doc #5 ) upon all defendants on 12/22/2022. (Reissner, Joel) [Transferred from Arizona on 4/3/2023.]
December 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER that motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) are discouraged if the defect can be cured by filing an amended pleading. The parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of such motions to determine whether it can be avoided. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff(s) serve a copy of this Order upon Defendant(s) and file a notice of service. See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Judge Douglas L. Rayes on 12/19/2022. (ESG) [Transferred from Arizona on 4/3/2023.]
December 19, 2022 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Robert Deutsch, Alexandra Leichter, Robert Leichter, David Winkler. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)(SCA). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. [Transferred from Arizona on 4/3/2023.]
December 16, 2022 Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number AAZDC-21418243. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Douglas L. Rayes. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-22-08234-PCT-DLR. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (SCA) [Transferred from Arizona on 4/3/2023.]
December 16, 2022 Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Robert Deutsch. (Reissner, Joel) (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)(SCA) [Transferred from Arizona on 4/3/2023.]
December 16, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number AAZDC-21418243 filed by Robert Deutsch. (Reissner, Joel) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(SCA) [Transferred from Arizona on 4/3/2023.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Robert Deutsch v. Anna Deutsch Trust dated September 3, 1991 et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert Deutsch
Represented By: Joel Newell Reissner
Represented By: Joel N. Reissner
Represented By: Vikram Brar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Anna Deutsch Trust dated September 3, 1991
Represented By: Neal B Jannol
Represented By: William D Black
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alexandra Leichter
Represented By: William D Black
Represented By: Neal B Jannol
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Robert Leichter
Represented By: William D Black
Represented By: Neal B Jannol
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David Winkler
Represented By: William D Black
Represented By: Neal B Jannol
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?