Nonna Podolsky v. State Farm General Insurance Company et al
Plaintiff: Nonna Podolsky
Defendant: State Farm General Insurance Company and Does 1-25, inclusive
Case Number: 2:2023cv02364
Filed: March 30, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Rozella A Oliver
Referring Judge: Stephen V Wilson
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 24, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO REQUEST A REMOTE APPEARANCE by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. Based upon the foregoing Motion, and good cause shown appearing in support thereof, the Court grants Plaintiff's counsel Carl J. Snider's requests to appear remotely at the Initial Status Conference scheduled for June 5, 2023 at 3:00 PM PST.; granting #26 REQUEST for Leave of Carl J. Snider to Appear for Remotely via Zoom. (aco)
May 22, 2023 Filing 26 REQUEST for Leave of Carl J. Snider to Appear for Remotely via Zoom at the initial status conference filed by Plaintiff Nonna Podolsky. Request set for hearing on 6/5/2023 at 03:00 PM before Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (Proposed) Order Granting Motion to Request a Remote Appearance) (Furtado, David)
May 10, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE INITIAL STATUS CONFERENCE #24 by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. The Initial Status Conference scheduled for May 15, 2023 at 3:00 P.M. be continued to June 5, 2023 at 3:00 P.M. (lom)
May 9, 2023 Filing 24 Joint STIPULATION to Continue Initial Status Conference from May 15, 2023 to June 5, 2023 filed by Plaintiff Nonna Podolsky. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (Proposed) Order Granting Joint Stipulation to Continue the initial status conference)(Furtado, David)
May 5, 2023 Filing 23 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN FILED DOCUMENT RE: Notice (Other) #21 by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. The document is stricken. (aco)
May 5, 2023 Filing 22 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: Notice (Other) #21 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Motion. Proposed document was not submitted or was not submitted as a separate attachment. Hearing information is missing, incorrect, or untimely. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (aco)
May 4, 2023 Filing 21 [DOCUMENT STRICKEN PER ORDER ON 05/05/2023, SEE DOCKET NO. 23] Notice Request to Appear Remotely filed by Plaintiff Nonna Podolsky. David J. Furtado's request to Appear remotely Remotely Via Zoom (Furtado, David) Modified on 5/5/2023 (aco).
May 4, 2023 Filing 20 STIPULATION to Continue Initial Status Confere from May 15, 2022 to May 10, 2023 filed by Plaintiff Nonna Podolsky. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (Proposed) Order Granting Joint Stipulation to Continue Status Conference)(Furtado, David)
May 4, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 19 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Stephen V. Wilson: The Court, on its own Motion, continues the ZOOM - New Case Status Conference set for May, 8, 2023 to May 15, 2023 at 3:00 PM. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (dbe) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
April 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 18 IN CHAMBERS ORDER/TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Judge Stephen V. Wilson re: Request to Appear Remotely filed by Plaintiff #17 - The request is GRANTED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (pc) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
April 24, 2023 Filing 17 Notice Request to Appear Remotely filed by Plaintiff Nonna Podolsky. David J. Furtado's request to Appear Remotely Via Zoom (Furtado, David)
April 14, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER ON APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY TO APPEAR IN A SPECIFIC CASE PRO HAC VICE by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. APPLICATION of Attorney Carl J. Snider to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Nonna Podolsky, designating David J. Furtado as local counsel.; GRANTING #11 Non-Resident Attorney Carl J. Snider. (aco)
April 14, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER SETTING INITIAL STATUS CONFERENCE for 5/8/2023 at 3:00 PM before Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (pc)
April 14, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 14 NEW CASE ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (pc)
April 13, 2023 Filing 13 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero to Judge Stephen V. Wilson for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 2:23-cv-02364-SVW-RAOx. (aco)
April 12, 2023 Filing 12 DECLINED STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge filed by Defendant State Farm General Insurance Company. (Torres, Juan)
April 11, 2023 Filing 11 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Carl J. Snider to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Nonna Podolsky (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Previously Paid on 4/10/2023, Receipt No. ACACDC-35111217) filed by Plaintiff Nonna Podolsky. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (Proposed) Order on Application of Non-Resident Attorney to Appear in a Specific Case Pro Hac Vice) (Furtado, David)
April 11, 2023 Filing 10 NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Carl J. Snider to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Nonna Podolsky (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-35111217) #9 . The following error(s) was/were found: Proposed Order has not been flattened and is causing a corruption with the filing. (lt)
April 10, 2023 Filing 9 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Carl J. Snider to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Nonna Podolsky (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-35111217) filed by Plaintiff Nonna Podolsky. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (Proposed) Order on Application of Non-Resident Attorney to Appear in a Specific Case Pro Hac Vice) (Furtado, David)
April 6, 2023 Filing 8 DECLARATION of David J. Furtado as Lead Trial counsel filed by Plaintiff Nonna Podolsky. (Furtado, David)
April 6, 2023 Filing 7 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Nonna Podolsky, (Furtado, David)
April 6, 2023 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney David J. Furtado on behalf of Plaintiff Nonna Podolsky (Furtado, David)
April 4, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C Statement of Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge) (ghap)
March 30, 2023 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1-25, inclusive, State Farm General Insurance Company. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Nonna Podolsky. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 2/24/2023 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT A) (ghap)
March 30, 2023 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant State Farm General Insurance Company. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 3/29/2023 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT C)(ghap)
March 30, 2023 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant State Farm General Insurance Company, re Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 served on March 30, 2023. (Torres, Juan)
March 30, 2023 Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant State Farm General Insurance Company, identifying State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. (Torres, Juan)
March 30, 2023 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant State Farm General Insurance Company. (Torres, Juan)
March 30, 2023 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 23VECV00864 Receipt No: ACACDC-35049633 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant State Farm General Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Notice of Removal, #2 Exhibit B to Notice of Removal, #3 Exhibit C to Notice of Removal, #4 Exhibit D to Elie Declaration, #5 Exhibit E to Elie Declaration) (Attorney Juan A Torres added to party State Farm General Insurance Company(pty:dft))(Torres, Juan)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nonna Podolsky v. State Farm General Insurance Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nonna Podolsky
Represented By: David J Furtado
Represented By: Carl J. Snider
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: State Farm General Insurance Company
Represented By: Juan A Torres
Represented By: Steven J. Elie
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-25, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?