Stephanie Berkley v. Metropolitan Life insurance Company
| Stephanie Berkley |
| Metropolitan Life insurance Company |
| 2:2023cv02386 |
| March 30, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Steve Kim |
| Josephine L Staton |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER GRANTING Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Initial Complaint (Doc. #11 ) by Judge Josephine L. Staton that Defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Company shall have up to and including 6/5/2023 to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. (jp)
|
| Filing 11 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to 6/5/2023 filed by Defendant Metropolitan Life insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Attorney Robert E Hess added to party Metropolitan Life insurance Company(pty:dft))(Hess, Robert) |
| Filing 10 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON. (vv) |
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Stephanie Berkley, upon Defendant Metropolitan Life insurance Company served on 4/4/2023, answer due 4/25/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Jesse Gastelum at CT Corporation, Agent for Service of Process in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Kantor, Glenn) |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Metropolitan Life insurance Company. (car) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (car) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Stephanie Berkley. (Kantor, Glenn) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Stephanie Berkley, (Kantor, Glenn) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Stephanie Berkley. (Kantor, Glenn) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-35053790 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff Stephanie Berkley. (Attorney Glenn R. Kantor added to party Stephanie Berkley(pty:pla))(Kantor, Glenn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Stephanie Berkley v. Metropolitan Life insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Stephanie Berkley | |
| Represented By: | Glenn R. Kantor |
| Represented By: | Anna M. Martin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Metropolitan Life insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Robert E Hess |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
