Christina Miller v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
Christina Miller |
Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company |
2:2023cv02388 |
March 30, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Margo A Rocconi |
Mark C Scarsi |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. Scheduling Conference set for 6/26/2023 at 10:00 AM before Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (smo) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company, identifying Tokio Marine Holdings, Inc.. (Brisbin, Michael) |
Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company.(Attorney Michael K Brisbin added to party Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company(pty:dft))(Brisbin, Michael) |
Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Christina Miller, upon Defendant Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company served on 4/3/2023, answer due 4/24/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Registered Agent, by serving Diane Reese - Authorized Agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Kantor, Glenn) |
Filing 9 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE MARK C. SCARSI upon filing of the complaint by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (smo) |
Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company. (sh) |
Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Mark C. Scarsi and Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi. (sh) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Christina Miller, (Kantor, Glenn) |
Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Christina Miller. (Kantor, Glenn) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Christina Miller. (Kantor, Glenn) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-35053991 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Christina Miller. (Attorney Glenn R. Kantor added to party Christina Miller(pty:pla))(Kantor, Glenn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Christina Miller v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Christina Miller | |
Represented By: | Glenn R. Kantor |
Represented By: | Peter S Sessions |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company | |
Represented By: | Michael K Brisbin |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.