Julie Ann Goldberg v. Laura Rachel Ruano et al
| Julie Ann Goldberg |
| Laura Rachel Ruano and Thomas Monteleone |
| 2:2023cv02395 |
| March 30, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Alicia G Rosenberg |
| George H Wu |
| Assault Libel & Slander |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by defendant Laura Rachel Ruano. Motion set for hearing on 6/22/2023 at 08:30 AM before Judge George H. Wu. (Attorney Timothy R Hanigan added to party Laura Rachel Ruano(pty:dft)) (Hanigan, Timothy) |
| Filing 15 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Julie Ann Goldberg, upon Defendant Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Defendant Laura Rachel Ruano in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service (Goldberg, Julie) |
| Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Defendant Julie Ann Goldberg, upon Defendant Laura Rachel Ruano served on 5/9/2023, answer due 5/30/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Defendant Laura Rachel Ruano in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service (Goldberg, Julie) |
Filing 13
ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 21-01 (Related Case) filed. Transfer of case declined by Judge Fernando M. Olguin, for the reasons set forth on this order. Related Case No. 2:22-cv-04858 FMO(Ex) (rn)
|
|
Filing 12
STANDING ORDER RE FINAL PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCES FOR CIVIL JURY TRIALS BEFORE JUDGE GEORGE H. WU by Judge George H. Wu. You are instructed to read and to follow (unless otherwise superseded herein) the Central District of California Local Rules (henceforth "Local Rules") 16-1 through 16-15 regarding pre-trial requirements. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS). (aco)
|
| Filing 11 AMENDED CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Julie Ann Goldberg. (Goldberg, Julie) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): Attachment 1 Civil Cover Sheet should be e-filed separately. The correct event category is located under Civil Events - Other Filings - Miscellaneous Filings. (car) |
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Thomas Monteleone. (car) |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Laura Rachel Ruano. (car) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge George H. Wu and Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. (car) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Julie Ann Goldberg. (Goldberg, Julie) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Julie Ann Goldberg. (Goldberg, Julie) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Julie Ann Goldberg, (Goldberg, Julie) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: CCACDC-35055246 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Julie Ann Goldberg. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Attorney Julie Ann Goldberg added to party Julie Ann Goldberg(pty:pla))(Goldberg, Julie) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
