Jose Rodriguez et al v. Nissan North America, Inc. et al
Jose Rodriguez and Edith Portillo |
Nissan North America, Inc. and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
2:2023cv02453 |
April 3, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Dolly M Gee |
Michael R Wilner |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal -- Other Contract |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Dolly M. Gee: The Court sua sponte VACATES the Scheduling Conference set on May 19, 2023. A Scheduling and Case Management Order to issue. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (kti) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 12 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 5 days, filed by Plaintiffs Edith Portillo, Jose Rodriguez.. (Jacobson, Kevin) |
Filing 11 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Nissan North America, Inc., re Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Notice of Related Case(s) #4 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 served on April 4, 2023. (Salas, Rodrigo) |
Filing 10 SCHEDULING MEETING OF COUNSEL [Fed. R. Civ. P. 16, 26(f)] by Judge Dolly M. Gee. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 5/5/2023. Scheduling Conference set for 5/19/2023 at 9:30 a.m. (See order for details.) (kti) |
Filing 9 INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (kti) |
Filing 8 ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO Local Rule 83-1.3.1 and General Order 21-01 -Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 2:21-cv-09326 MRW. Case referred from Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar to Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner for Discovery. The case number will now read as follows: 2:23-cv-02453 DMG(MRWx). Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (rn) |
Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (ghap) |
NON CONFORM COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant Nissan North America, Inc. (SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT B)(ghap) |
CONFORMED FILED COPY COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 through 10, inclusive, Nissan North America, Inc. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiffs Jose Rodriguez, Edith Portillo. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 3/3/2023 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT A) (ghap) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendant Nissan North America, Inc.. Related Case(s): 2:21-cv-09326-MRW, 8:21-cv-02029-MRW, 2:21-cv-09669-MRW, 2:22-cv-00239-MRW, 2:22-cv-04152-MRW, 2:22-cv-08732-MRW, 2:22-cv-08978-MRW (Salas, Rodrigo) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Nissan North America, Inc., identifying Nissan Motor Co., Ltd.. (Salas, Rodrigo) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Nissan North America, Inc.. (Salas, Rodrigo) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 23NWCV00669 Receipt No: ACACDC-35064159 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Nissan North America, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Rodrigo E. Salas, #2 Exhibit A - Complaint - file endorsed, #3 Exhibit B - Nissan's Answer to Complaint, #4 Exhibit C - Nissan's Statement and Designation by Foreign Corporation, #5 Exhibit D - Nissan's entity details) (Attorney Rodrigo E Salas added to party Nissan North America, Inc.(pty:dft))(Salas, Rodrigo) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.