Yongrui Ding v. USCIS Los Angeles Asylum Office
Plaintiff: Yongrui Ding
Defendant: USCIS Los Angeles Asylum Office
Case Number: 2:2023cv02494
Filed: April 3, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Steve Kim
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 1, 2023 Filing 9 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Siu P. Wong counsel for Defendant USCIS Los Angeles Asylum Office. Adding Siu P. Wong as counsel of record for USCIS Los Angeles Asylum Office for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by defendant USCIS Los Angeles Asylum Office. (Attorney Siu P. Wong added to party USCIS Los Angeles Asylum Office(pty:dft))(Wong, Siu)
May 4, 2023 Filing 8 REMINDER NOTICE re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. Each party must file form CV-11C within the consent deadlines pursuant to L.R. 73-2. Additionally, the parties are directed to L.R. 73-2.2 Proof of Service. In any case in which only a magistrate judge is initially assigned, plaintiff must file a proof of service within 10 days of service of the summons and complaint as to each defendant. (et)
April 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 (IN CHAMBERS) STANDING ORDER by Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. This action has been assigned to the civil consent calendar of Judge Steve Kim through the Voluntary Consent Program or the Magistrate Judges Direct Assignment Program. (see document for details). (et)
April 4, 2023 Filing 6 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant USCIS Los Angeles Asylum Office. (Attachments: #1 Summons for Civil Process Clerk, #2 Summons for Attorney General of the United States) (ghap)
April 4, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C Statement of Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge) (ghap)
April 3, 2023 Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Yongrui Ding. (Chen, Michael)
April 3, 2023 Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Yongrui Ding, identifying None. (Chen, Michael)
April 3, 2023 Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Yongrui Ding. (Attachments: #1 Supplement, #2 Supplement)(Chen, Michael)
April 3, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-35072222 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Yongrui Ding. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Attorney Michael Chen added to party Yongrui Ding(pty:pla))(Chen, Michael)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Yongrui Ding v. USCIS Los Angeles Asylum Office
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Yongrui Ding
Represented By: Michael Chen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: USCIS Los Angeles Asylum Office
Represented By: OIL-DCS Trial Attorney
Represented By: Siu P. Wong
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?