Yongrui Ding v. USCIS Los Angeles Asylum Office
Yongrui Ding |
USCIS Los Angeles Asylum Office |
2:2023cv02494 |
April 3, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Steve Kim |
Other Immigration Actions |
05 U.S.C. ยง 551 Administrative Procedure Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Siu P. Wong counsel for Defendant USCIS Los Angeles Asylum Office. Adding Siu P. Wong as counsel of record for USCIS Los Angeles Asylum Office for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by defendant USCIS Los Angeles Asylum Office. (Attorney Siu P. Wong added to party USCIS Los Angeles Asylum Office(pty:dft))(Wong, Siu) |
Filing 8 REMINDER NOTICE re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. Each party must file form CV-11C within the consent deadlines pursuant to L.R. 73-2. Additionally, the parties are directed to L.R. 73-2.2 Proof of Service. In any case in which only a magistrate judge is initially assigned, plaintiff must file a proof of service within 10 days of service of the summons and complaint as to each defendant. (et) |
Filing 7 (IN CHAMBERS) STANDING ORDER by Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. This action has been assigned to the civil consent calendar of Judge Steve Kim through the Voluntary Consent Program or the Magistrate Judges Direct Assignment Program. (see document for details). (et) |
Filing 6 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant USCIS Los Angeles Asylum Office. (Attachments: #1 Summons for Civil Process Clerk, #2 Summons for Attorney General of the United States) (ghap) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C Statement of Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge) (ghap) |
Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Yongrui Ding. (Chen, Michael) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Yongrui Ding, identifying None. (Chen, Michael) |
Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Yongrui Ding. (Attachments: #1 Supplement, #2 Supplement)(Chen, Michael) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-35072222 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Yongrui Ding. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Attorney Michael Chen added to party Yongrui Ding(pty:pla))(Chen, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Yongrui Ding v. USCIS Los Angeles Asylum Office | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Yongrui Ding | |
Represented By: | Michael Chen |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: USCIS Los Angeles Asylum Office | |
Represented By: | OIL-DCS Trial Attorney |
Represented By: | Siu P. Wong |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.