Travelers Commercial Insurance Company v. Miele, Inc.
| Traveler Commercial Insurance Company and Travelers Commercial Insurance Company |
| Miele, Inc., |
| 2:2023cv02604 |
| April 6, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Alka Sagar |
| Josephine L Staton |
| Tort Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 24
ORDER by Judge Josephine L. Staton GRANTING #22 Non-Resident Attorney Richard A Schuster APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Travelers Commercial Insurance Company, designating Katherine A Sandoval as local counsel. (jp)
|
|
Filing 23
ORDER by Judge Josephine L. Staton GRANTING #21 Non-Resident Attorney Arnd N von Waldow APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Miele, Inc., designating Jarrad L Wood as local counsel. (jp)
|
| Filing 22 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Richard A. Schuster to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Travelers Commercial Insurance Company (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500.00 Previously Paid on 5/4/2023, Receipt No. 35243925) filed by Plaintiff Travelers Commercial Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Sandoval, Katherine) |
| Filing 21 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Arnd N. von Waldow to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Miele, Inc., (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Previously Paid on 5/8/2023, Receipt No. 35272554) filed by Defendant Miele, Inc.,. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Wood, Jarrad) |
| Filing 20 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN FILED DOCUMENT RE: EX PARTE APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Arnd N. von Waldow to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Miele, Inc., (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-35272554) #16 by Judge Josephine L. Staton. The document is STRICKEN. (jp) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: EX PARTE APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Arnd N. von Waldow to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Miele, Inc., (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-35272554) #16 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 83-2.1.3.3(d) Certificate of Good Standing not attached for every state court listed to which the applicant has been admitted. Other error(s) with document(s): Missing LA and WVA. (lt) |
| Filing 18 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN FILED DOCUMENT RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Richard A. Schuster to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Travelers Commercial Insurance Company (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-35243925) #12 by Judge Josephine L. Staton. The document is stricken. (jp) |
|
Filing 17
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Josephine L. Staton. Scheduling Conference set for 6/30/2023 at 10:30 AM before Judge Josephine L. Staton. (vv)
|
| Filing 16 [DOCUMENT STRICKEN PER COURT'S ORDER #20 ] - EX PARTE APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Arnd N. von Waldow to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Miele, Inc., (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-35272554) filed by Defendant Miele, Inc.,. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Wood, Jarrad) Modified on 5/9/2023 (jp). |
| Filing 15 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Miele, Inc.,, (Wood, Jarrad) |
| Filing 14 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 with Affirmative Defenses filed by Defendant Miele, Inc.,.(Attorney Jarrad Lucian Wood added to party Miele, Inc., (pty:dft))(Wood, Jarrad) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Richard A. Schuster to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Travelers Commercial Insurance Company (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-35243925) #12 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 5-4.3.4 Application not hand-signed. (lt) |
| Filing 12 [DOCUMENT STRICKEN PER COURT'S ORDER #18 ] - APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Richard A. Schuster to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Travelers Commercial Insurance Company (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-35243925) filed by Plaintiff Travelers Commercial Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Sandoval, Katherine). Modified on 5/8/2023 (jp). |
| Filing 11 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: Proof of Service S/C #10 . The following error(s) was/were found: (1) Incorrect document is attached to the docket entry. (2) Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 Days) - under Category - Service/Waivers of Summons and Complaints. (3) USM-285 Service of S/C - (21 days) etc., event utilized in docketing this filing. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (jp) |
| Filing 10 PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN (USM-285) of summons and Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 upon Miele, Inc., served on 4/18/2023, answer due 5/9/2023, served by Personal Service service, by Federal statute, upon Miele, Inc.. Remarks: N/A., PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN (USM-285) of summons and Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 upon Miele, Inc., served on 4/18/2023, answer due 5/9/2023, served by Personal Service service, by Federal statute, upon Miele, Inc.. Remarks: N/A., PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN (USM-285) of summons unexecuted re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 for Miele, Inc.,. (Sandoval, Katherine) |
| Filing 9 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON. (vv) |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Miele, Inc. (jp) |
| Filing 7 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Notice of Assignment to United States Judges(CV-18) - optional html form #4 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Notice to Counsel Re: Consent to Proceed before a US Magistrate Judge - optional html form #6 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program (ADR-8) - optional html form #5 filed by plaintiff Traveler Commercial Insurance Company. (Sandoval, Katherine) |
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (ghap) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff All Plaintiffs, identifying Travelers Commercial Insurance Company a/s/o Monoco Simantob. (Sandoval, Katherine) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Traveler Commercial Insurance Company a/s/o Monoco Simantob. (Sandoval, Katherine) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-35095652 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Traveler Commercial Insurance Company a/s/o Monoco Simantob. (Attorney Katherine Ann Sandoval added to party Traveler Commercial Insurance Company a/s/o Monoco Simantob(pty:pla))(Sandoval, Katherine) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
