Jorge Alejandro Rojas v. Bottom Line Concepts LLC et al
Jorge Alejandro Rojas |
Bottom Line Concepts LLC and Joshua Fox |
2:2023cv02667 |
April 8, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Sherilyn Peace Garnett |
Karen L Stevenson |
Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) |
47 U.S.C. ยง 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett. (pg) |
Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett and Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. (sh) |
Filing 3 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 as to Defendants Bottom Line Concepts LLC, Joshua Fox. (Attachments: #1 Bottom Line Concepts LLC)(sh) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Jorge Alejandro Rojas, (sh) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendants Bottom Line Concepts LLC, Joshua Fox.Case assigned to Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott.(Filing fee $ 402 FEE PAID), filed by Plaintiff Jorge Alejandro Rojas. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (sh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.