Barron K. Simmons v. B. Arreguin et al
| Barron K Simmons and Barron Keith Simmons |
| B. Arreguin, M. Guzman, Warden R.C. Johnson, B. Perez, R. Tapia, F. Villalobos, C.D.C.R Secretary Kathleen Allison and G. Miranda |
| 2:2023cv02777 |
| April 13, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Wesley L Hsu |
| Sheri Pym |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER OF THE CHIEF JUDGE (#23-039) approved by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Pursuant to the recommended procedure adopted by the Court for the Creation of Calendar of Judge Wesley L. Hsu, this case is transferred from Judge Cormac J. Carney to the calendar of Judge Wesley L. Hsu for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:23-cv-02777 WLH(SP). (rn)
|
|
Filing 5
INITIAL CIVIL RIGHTS CASE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym (SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS). (kca)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Kathleen Allison, B. Arreguin, M. Guzman, R.C. Johnson, G. Miranda, B. Perez, R. Tapia, F. Villalobos, (Sheps, Ari) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),,,, #1 . The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. Attachment(s): # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, should not have been attached to Docket Entry No. 2. The document(s) should have been filed separately. You are not required to take any action to correct this deficiency unless the Court so directs. (sh) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Cormac J. Carney and referred to Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (sh) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed against Defendants Kathleen Allison, B. Arreguin, M. Guzman, R.C. Johnson, G. Miranda, B. Perez, R. Tapia, F. Villalobos pursuant to 42:1983., filed by Plaintiff Barron Keith Simmons.[FILED IN STATE COURT 01/31/2023 SUBMITTED AS ATTACHMENT NO. 2 TO THE NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ] (sh) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles, case number 23AVCV00127 Receipt No: ACACDC-35132324 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendants R. Tapia, M. Guzman, F. Villalobos, G. Miranda, B. Arreguin, Kathleen Allison, R.C. Johnson, B. Perez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Complaint, #3 Summons on Complaint, #4 Certificate of Mailing on Summons and Complaint, #5 Order on Court Fee Waiver, #6 Certificate of Mailing on Order of Court Fee Waiver, #7 Notice of Case Assignment, #8 State Civil Case Cover Sheet) (Attorney Ari Sheps added to party Kathleen Allison(pty:dft), Attorney Ari Sheps added to party B. Arreguin(pty:dft), Attorney Ari Sheps added to party M. Guzman(pty:dft), Attorney Ari Sheps added to party R.C. Johnson(pty:dft), Attorney Ari Sheps added to party G. Miranda(pty:dft), Attorney Ari Sheps added to party B. Perez(pty:dft), Attorney Ari Sheps added to party R. Tapia(pty:dft), Attorney Ari Sheps added to party F. Villalobos(pty:dft))(Sheps, Ari) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
