Andre Nesbit v. Sunrise Restaurants et al
| Andre Nesbit |
| Sunrise Restaurants and EDD |
| 2:2023cv02822 |
| April 10, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Maria A Audero |
| Stephen V Wilson |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 24 NOTICE OF LODGING Judgment filed by plaintiff Andre Nesbit. (aco) |
Filing 23
SCHEDULING NOTICE IN CHAMBERS ORDER/TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Judge Stephen V. Wilson Motion for Summary Judgment #13 ; and Motion for Summary Judgment #14 - The motions are deemed moot. The hearings are vacated. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (pc) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 22 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY Re: APPLICATION for Clerk to Enter Default against Defendants EDD, Sunrise Restaurants #21 . The Clerk cannot enter the requested relief as: Request for Entry of Default has been forwarded to the assigned Judge. Request for Default Judgment has been forwarded to the assigned Judge. (bm) |
| Filing 21 NOTICE of DEFAULT and APPLICATION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT AND ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT BY CLERK filed by plaintiff Andre Nesbit. (aco) |
| Filing 20 AFFIDAVIT filed by Plaintiff Andre Nesbit. (aco) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT filed by plainitff Andre Nesbit. Motion set for hearing on 6/26/2023 at 01:30 PM before Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (aco) |
| Filing 25 Exhibit List Filed filed by Plaintiff Andre Nesbit. (aco) |
| Filing 18 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Andre Nesbit, upon Defendant Sunrise Restaurants served on 4/24/2023, answer due 5/15/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Sunrise Restaurants Sunrise by certified mail and first class mail pursuant to Rule 5(b)(C) of Federal Rules Civil Procedure. Additionally, Sunrise Restaurats was served by Electronic service to there attorneys representing them in their state case with the plaintiff. (lom) |
| Filing 15 MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES filed by Plaintiff Andre Nesbit. (aco) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by plaintiff Andre Nesbit. Motion set for hearing on 6/26/2023 at 01:30 PM before Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (aco) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by plaintiff Andre Nesbit. Motion set for hearing on 6/26/2023 at 01:30 PM before Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (aco) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE OF LODGING Statement of Consent to Proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge filed by Plaintiff Andre Nesbit (rn) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE OF LODGING Statement of Consent to Proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge filed by Plaintiff Andre Nesbit (rn) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER ON REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (NON-PRISONER CASE) by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. On the question of indigency, the Court finds that the party who filed the Request: is not able to pay the filing fees. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: The Request is GRANTED.; granting #2 APPLICATION to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60). (aco)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: Consent to Proceed (CV-11C) before US Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program Non-Final #9 . The following error(s) was/were found: Wrong form used, the correct form CV 11D form. Please refer to General Order 18-11. Also the parties indicated in the document are not the correct parties pursuant to the case number In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (rn) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: Consent to Proceed (CV-11C) before US Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program Non-Final #8 . The following error(s) was/were found: Wrong form used, the correct form CV 11D form. Please refer to General Order 18-11. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (rn) |
|
Filing 7
NEW CASE ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (pc)
|
| Filing 9 STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge filed by Plaintiff Andre Nesbit. (rn) |
| Filing 8 STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge filed by Plaintiff Andre Nesbit. (rn) |
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stephen V. Wilson and Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. (jtil) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Andre Nesbit. (jtil) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Andre Nesbit. (jtil) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Andre Nesbit against Defendants EDD, Sunrise Restaurants. Case assigned to Judge Stephen V. Wilson for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. Jury Demand. (Attachments: #1 CV71, #2 Summons Request, #3 Summons Request 2) (jtil) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
