Rosalba Martinez v. Walmart Inc. et al
| Rosalba Martinez |
| Sams West Inc Erroneously Sued As Walmart Inc. doing business as Sams Club and Does 1 to 20 |
| 2:2023cv02839 |
| April 17, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Margo A Rocconi |
| Mark C Scarsi |
| Christina A Snyder |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
TEXT ONLY ENTRY (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TAKING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE UNDER SUBMISSION by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: The Court has considered the parties' Joint Rule 16(b)/26(f) Report with respect to the Scheduling Conference and has concluded that the hearing on June 26, 2023 is not necessary. Accordingly, the Scheduling Conference is taken off calendar and under submission. No appearance by counsel is necessary. A separate order will issue setting the deadlines and dates for this case. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (smo)
|
| Filing 11 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 4-6 days., filed by Defendant Sams West Inc.. (D'Angelo, Bron) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Sams West Inc, re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 served on April 18, 2023. (D'Angelo, Bron) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. Scheduling Conference set for 6/26/2023 at 10:00 AM before Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (smo)
|
|
Filing 8
INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE MARK C. SCARSI upon filing of the complaint by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (smo)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Christina A. Snyder. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 21-01. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Christina A. Snyder to Judge Mark C. Scarsi for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:23-cv-02839 MCS(MARx). (rn)
|
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Christina A. Snyder and Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi. (sh) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Walmart, Inc. dba Sam's Club. (D'Angelo, Bron) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Walmart, Inc. dba Sam's Club, identifying Sam's West. (D'Angelo, Bron) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 22STCV14728 Receipt No: ACACDC-35145492 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Walmart, Inc. dba Sam's Club. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 1 - Complaint, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 2 - Summons, #4 Exhibit Exhibit 3 - Answer, #5 Exhibit Exhibit 4 - Form Interrogatories to Ptf, #6 Exhibit 4 - Ptf's Responses, #7 Exhibit 5 - CA SOS, #8 Exhibit 6 - AR SOS) (Attorney Bron Erik D'Angelo added to party Walmart, Inc. dba Sam's Club(pty:dft))(D'Angelo, Bron) |
| CONFORMED EFILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint filed by Defendant Sams West Inc.[FILED IN STATE COURT 12/27/2022 SUBMITTED AS ATTACHMENT NO. 4 TO THE NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ](sh) |
| CONFORMED EFILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does, Sams West Inc., filed by Plaintiff Rosalba Martinez.[FILED IN STATE COURT 05/03/2022 SUBMITTED AS ATTACHMENT NO. 2 TO THE NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ] (sh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
