Leemanuel Weilch v. Paul R. Paiz et al
| Leemanuel Weilch |
| Paul R. Paiz and Does 1 to 10 |
| 2:2023cv02887 |
| April 18, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Mark C Scarsi |
| Michael R Wilner |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
ORDER by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: granting #14 APPLICATION to Stay Case re Early Mediation ADA Disability Access Litigation as to All Defendants for period of 75 days. The ADR proceeding No. 2 is to be completed no later than 8/30/2023. (lc)
|
| Filing 15 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: Defendant Paul R. Paiz's APPLICATION to Stay Case and Early Mediation re ADA Disability Access Litigation, #14 . The following error(s) was/were found: Proposed document was not submitted or was not submitted as a separate attachment. Missing corresponding proposed order form which should have been submitted as a separate attachment. Other error(s) with document(s): As an alternative, prepare and e-file a formal Notice of Lodging, to be docketed only under its specific event: Notice of Lodging, to which the formal proposed order form is submitted as a Separate Attachment thereto.. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc) |
| Filing 14 APPLICATION to Stay Case and Early Mediation re ADA Disability Access Litigation, filed by Defendant Paul R. Paiz. (Attorney Solis Cooperson added to party Paul R. Paiz(pty:dft)) (Cooperson, Solis) |
| Filing 13 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Leemanuel Weilchto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive-form only-no proceeding held #11 re: Supplemental Jurisdiction (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration)(Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 12 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (smo) |
|
Filing 11
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) Order to Show Cause (ADA) by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 5/3/2023. (smo)
|
|
Filing 10
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) Order re Prosecution of Certain Cases Under the Americans With Disabilities Act by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (smo)
|
|
Filing 9
INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE MARK C. SCARSI upon filing of the complaint by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (smo)
|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Paul R. Paiz. (sh) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Mark C. Scarsi and Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (sh) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 Leemanuel Weilch. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Leemanuel Weilch. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-35154975 - Fee: $402. (Attorney Jason J Kim added to party Leemanuel Weilch(pty:pla))(Kim, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
