Oppenheimer and Co. Inc. v. Steven Ginn
| Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. and Oppenheimer and Co. Inc. |
| Steven Ginn |
| 2:2023cv02994 |
| April 20, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Steve Kim |
| Otis D Wright |
| Other Statutes: Arbitration |
| 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 30
REPLY in Support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Preliminary Injunction re FINRA Arbitration #16 filed by Plaintiff Oppenheimer and Co. Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of William J. Mahoney, Jr., Esq., in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction)(Henrich, Holly)
|
|
Filing 29
OBJECTIONS to Response in Opposition to Motion #28 [Plaintiff's Evidentiary Objections to the Declaration of Philip J. Vujanov Filed in Support of Defendant's Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction] filed by Plaintiff Oppenheimer and Co. Inc.. (Henrich, Holly)
|
|
Filing 28
OPPOSITION filed by Defendant Steven Ginn. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Steven Ginn, #2 Declaration Declaration of Philip Vujanov)(Vujanov, Philip)
|
|
Filing 27
AMENDED NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES #26 in Electronically Filed Document RE: Defendant Steven Ginn's Answer to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) 21. The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7-1.1 no notice of interested parties. NOTE: Although the attorney area of filing cites out of state attorney Philip L. Vujanov with Cleveland, Ohio Address, but with California Bar Number [(admission to Central District of CA " PENDING")].It is unclear if attorney should file a Pro Hac Vice Application and submit corresponding Order should be filed and processed. As a result he has not been added as attorney of record on this case. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc)
|
|
Filing 26
NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: Defendant Steven Ginn's Answer to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #21 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7-1.1 no notice of interested parties. NOTE: Although the attorney area of filing cites out of state attorney Philip L. Vujanov as (admission to Central District of CA "PENDING")... No record of pro hac vice application and its requirements on file to date. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc)
|
|
Filing 25
ORDER RE JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION #22 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The June 5, 2023, 1:30 p.m., hearing on the Motion for Preliminary Injunction shall be continued to August 1, 2023, at 11:30 AM #16 ; Defendant's opposition : May 31, 2023; Plaintiff's reply: June 12, 2023. (lc)
|
|
Filing 24
ORDER that the Scheduling Conference is set for July 31, 2023 at 1:30 PM ; compliance with FRCP 16, and 26(f) and filing of joint report; Counsel for plaintiff shall immediately serve this Order on all parties, including any new parties to the action by Judge Otis D Wright, II. (lc)
|
|
Filing 23
RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Oppenheimer and Co. Inc.to Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,,, Set/Reset Deadlines,, #20 Plaintiff's Response to Order to Show Cause re Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution (Henrich, Holly)
|
|
Filing 22
STIPULATION to Continue Hearing of motion for preliminary injuction from June 5, 2023 to June 26, 2023 Re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Preliminary Injunction re FINRA Arbitration #16 filed by defendant Steven Ginn. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Proposed Order)(Steiner, Leonard)
|
|
Filing 21
ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by defendant Steven Ginn.(Attorney Leonard Steiner added to party Steven Ginn(pty:dft))(Steiner, Leonard)
|
|
Filing 20
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Plaintiff(s) is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE in writing no later than May 25, 2023 why this action should notbe dismissed for lack of prosecution. The Court will consider the filing of the following, as an appropriate response to this OSC, on or before the above date:Plaintiff's request for entry of default as to the defendant or Answer by the defendant(s). Failure to respond to the Court's Order may result in the dismissal of the action. (lc)
|
|
Filing 19
PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Oppenheimer and Co. Inc., upon Defendant Steven Ginn served on 5/2/2023, answer due 5/23/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Jason T. Albin, Esq., John S. Chapman, Esq., Craig H. Kuglar, Esq, and Philip L. Vujanov Esq., counsel for Defendant in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by method of service not specified (Henrich, Holly)
|
|
Filing 18
ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Jason D. Frank to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Oppenheimer and Co. Inc. and designating Holly A. Henrich as local counsel #15 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. (lc)
|
|
Filing 17
REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Preliminary Injunction re FINRA Arbitration #16 filed by Plaintiff Oppenheimer and Co. Inc.. (Henrich, Holly)
|
|
Filing 16
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Preliminary Injunction re FINRA Arbitration filed by Plaintiff Oppenheimer and Co. Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 6/5/2023 at 01:30 PM before Judge Otis D. Wright II. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Motion for Preliminary Injunction, #2 Declaration of Michelle Alvarez in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction, #3 Declaration of William E. Mahoney, Jr., Esq. in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction, #4 Proposed Order Granting Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction, #5 Declaration of Proof of Service) (Henrich, Holly)
|
|
Filing 15
APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Jason D. Frank to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Oppenheimer and Co. Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-35205825) filed by Plaintiff Oppenheimer and Co. Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Henrich, Holly)
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Matthew C. McDonough to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Oppenheimer and Co. Inc. and designating Holly Henrich as local counsel #13 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. (lc)
|
|
Filing 13
APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Matthew C. McDonough to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Oppenheimer and Co. Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Previously Paid on 4/24/2023, Receipt No. ACACDC-35191470) filed by Plaintiff Oppenheimer and Co. Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Henrich, Holly)
|
|
Filing 12
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY- No mandatory chambers copies required, EXCEPT FOR EXCEPT FOR motions for summary judgment and any other evidence-heavy motions. The Court's Electronic Document Submission System (EDSS) allows people without lawyers who have pending cases in the US District Court for the Central District of California to submit documents electronically to the Clerk's Office The parties may consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge appearing on the voluntary consent list. PLEASE refer to Local Rule 79-5 for the submission of CIVIL ONLY SEALED DOCUMENTS. CRIMINAL SEALED DOCUMENTS will remain the same. Please refer to Court's Website and Judge's procedures for information as applicable. (lc)
|
|
Filing 11
NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Matthew C McDonough on behalf on Plaintiff. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (ghap)
|
|
Filing 10
NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Jason D. Frank on behalf on Plaintiff. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (ghap)
|
|
Filing 9
21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Steven Ginn. (ghap)
|
|
Filing 8
Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (ghap)
|
|
Filing 5
Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Oppenheimer & Co. Inc.. (Henrich, Holly)
|
|
Filing 4
CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Plaintiff Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. (Henrich, Holly)
|
|
Filing 3
Certificate and Notice of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Oppenheimer & Co. Inc., (Henrich, Holly)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Oppenheimer & Co. Inc.. (Henrich, Holly)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-35173305 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Oppenheimer & Co. Inc.. (Attorney Holly Henrich added to party Oppenheimer & Co. Inc.(pty:pla))(Henrich, Holly)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
