Laurence Braddell v. Capital One Auto Finance et al
| Laurence Braddell |
| Capital One, National Association, Trans Union LLC, DOES 1-10 Inclusive and Capital One Auto Finance |
| 2:2023cv03071 |
| April 24, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Rozella A Oliver |
| John F Walter |
| Consumer Credit |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 20
MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE by Judge John F. Walter. As a result of the parties' failure to file the Joint Rule 26(f) Report as required by the Court's Order of April 26, 2023, this action is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice. The Scheduling Conference, currently on calendar for June 5, 2023, is VACATED. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (iv)
|
| Filing 19 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) and Affirmative Defenses filed by Defendant Capital One Auto Finance.(Ritchie, Alan) |
| Filing 18 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) and Affirmative Defenses filed by Defendant Trans Union LLC.(Long, Charlotte) |
|
Filing 17
ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANTS' DEADLINES TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT AND CONTINUE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE #16 by Judge John F. Walter. DENIED BY ORDER OF THE COURT. (iv)
|
| Filing 16 Joint STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Response to the Complaint and Continue Scheduling Conference filed by Defendant Capital One Auto Finance. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Ritchie, Alan) |
|
Filing 15
ORDER ON STIPULATION TO EXTEND CAPITAL ONE AUTO FINANCE'S TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT #14 by Judge John F. Walter. Capital One shall have up to and including May 22, 2023, to file its response to Plaintiff's Complaint. (iv)
|
| Filing 14 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Capital One Auto Finance answer now due 5/22/2023, filed by Defendant Capital One Auto Finance. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Ritchie, Alan) |
| Filing 13 DECLARATION of Alan M. Ritchie Declaration of Lead Trial Counsel filed by Defendant Capital One Auto Finance. (Ritchie, Alan) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Trans Union LLC, identifying TransUnion, TransUnion Intermediate Holdings, Inc., T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.. (Long, Charlotte) |
| Filing 11 Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Trans Union LLC answer now due 5/22/2023, re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Trans Union LLC.(Attorney Charlotte Ann Long added to party Trans Union LLC(pty:dft))(Long, Charlotte) |
|
Filing 10
MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) COURT ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. Counsel are hereby notified that a Scheduling Conference has been set for June 5, 2023 at 1:15 p.m. before Judge John F. Walter in Courtroom 7A, 350 W. 1st St, Los Angeles, CA 90012. Lead Trial Counsel shall attend all proceedings before this Court, including the Scheduling Conference. Counsel are directed to comply with Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 26-1 in a timely fashion and to file a Joint Report, on or before May 19, 2023. (iv)
|
|
Filing 9
STANDING ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge John F. Walter. (iv)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Capital One Auto Finance, identifying Capital One Financial Corporation. (Ritchie, Alan) |
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John F. Walter and Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (ghap) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Capital One Auto Finance, Does, Trans Union LLC. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Laurence Braddell. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 3/22/2023 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT 1) (ghap) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Alan M Ritchie counsel for Defendant Capital One, National Association. Adding Alan M. Ritchie as counsel of record for Capital One Auto Finance, a division of Capital One, N.A., incorrectly named as "Capital One, National Association" for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Capital One Auto Finance, a division of Capital One, N.A.. (Ritchie, Alan) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Capital One, National Association. (Ritchie, Alan) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 23VECV01278 Receipt No: ACACDC-35186527 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Capital One, National Association. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Summons and Complaint, #2 Exhibit 2 - Defendant Trans Union's Consent to Removal) (Attorney Alan M Ritchie added to party Capital One, National Association(pty:dft))(Ritchie, Alan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
