Legendz Entertainment LLC et al v. Cam Specialty Lending 1 LTD et al
| Legendz Entertainment LLC and Cinematic LLC |
| Cam Specialty Lending 1 LTD, Crescendo Capital S.A., Crescendo Asset Management LLC, Brian Weiner and DOES 1 Through 25 |
| 2:2023cv03097 |
| April 24, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Margo A Rocconi |
| Otis D Wright |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 21 DAY Summons Issued re SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT #14 as to defendants Cam Specialty Lending 1 LTD, Crescendo Asset Management LLC, Crescendo Capital S.A., Brian Weiner. (lc) |
| Filing 15 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition #14 filed by Plaintiffs Cinematic LLC, Legendz Entertainment LLC. (Sarabekian, Seta) |
| Filing 14 Second AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants All Defendants amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , filed by Plaintiffs Legendz Entertainment LLC, Cinematic LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Sarabekian, Seta) |
Filing 13
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: On April 26, 2023, the Court dismissed with leave to amend Plaintiffs' Complaint for failure to sufficiently allege federal subject matter jurisdiction #11 . Specifically, theCourt explained that Plaintiffs' basis for jurisdiction, diversity jurisdiction, requires diverse citizenship of all plaintiffs from all defendants, and Plaintiffs failed to adequately allege the complete citizenship of any party. The Court identified each party whose citizenship Plaintiffs failed to adequately allege and why the Complaint's allegations were deficient. Plaintiffs immediately filed a First Amended Complaint #12 . However, Plaintiffs amend some, but not all, of the deficient citizenship allegations. As with the Complaint, Plaintiffs' allegations do not satisfy their burden to establish this Court's subject matter jurisdiction. Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint, with leave to amend the jurisdictional allegations within seven (7) days of the date of this order. Failure tofile a timely amended complaint that includes adequate jurisdictional allegations in light of the authorities cited will be deemed a concession by Plaintiffs that diversity jurisdiction is lacking, and the Court will close this case. (lc)
|
| Filing 12 (DISMISSED BY 4/28/2023 MINUTES DOCKET NO. 13). FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against DEFENDANTS All Defendants amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , filed by Plaintiffs Legendz Entertainment LLC, Cinematic LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Sarabekian, Seta) Modified on 4/28/2023 (lc). |
|
Filing 11
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The Court has reviewed the Complaint in this case and it is not clear that the Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action #1 . Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES Plaintiffs' Complaint, with leave to amend the jurisdictional allegations within seven (7) days of the date of this order. Failure to file a timelyamended complaint that includes adequate jurisdictional allegations in light of the authorities above will be deemed a concession by Plaintiffs that diversity jurisdiction is lacking, and the Court will close this case. (lc)
|
|
Filing 10
INITIAL STANDING ORDER by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. (hc)
|
| Filing 9 AMENDED CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs Cinematic LLC, Legendz Entertainment LLC, (Hughes, Bradford) |
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs Cinematic LLC, Legendz Entertainment LLC, (Hughes, Bradford) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (sh) |
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi. (sh) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Plaintiffs CINEMATIC, LLC, LEGENDZ ENTERTAINMENT, LLC (Hughes, Bradford) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs CINEMATIC, LLC, LEGENDZ ENTERTAINMENT, LLC. (Hughes, Bradford) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-35192985 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiffs LEGENDZ ENTERTAINMENT, LLC, CINEMATIC, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A) (Attorney Bradford G Hughes added to party CINEMATIC, LLC(pty:pla), Attorney Bradford G Hughes added to party LEGENDZ ENTERTAINMENT, LLC(pty:pla))(Hughes, Bradford) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
