August Image, LLC v. Skinsation LA, Inc. et al
| August Image, LLC |
| Skinsation LA, Inc. and Does 1-10 |
| 2:2023cv03200 |
| April 27, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Michael R Wilner |
| George H Wu |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 2-3 days, filed by Plaintiff August Image, LLC.. (Doniger, Stephen) |
Filing 14
MINUTES IN CHAMBERS - ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge George H. Wu. The Court sets a Scheduling Conference for July 10, 2023 at 8:30 a.m. Counsel are reminded of their obligations to disclose information, confer on a discovery plan, and report to the Court, as required by F.R.C.P. 26 and the Local Rules of this Court. Trial counsel are ordered to be present. A Joint 26(f) Report shall be filed with the Court no later than July 3, 2023. See Local Rule 26-1. (aco)
|
| Filing 13 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: Answer to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #12 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7-1.1 no notice of interested parties. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (aco) |
| Filing 12 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by SKINSATION LA, INC. Skinsation LA, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Attorney Sean T Cook added to party Skinsation LA, Inc.(pty:dft))(Cook, Sean) |
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff August Image, LLC, upon Defendant Skinsation LA, Inc. served on 5/4/2023, answer due 5/25/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Skinsation LA, Inc. c/o Lusanik Galustanian (Registered Agent) in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity and by also mailing a copy (Doniger, Stephen) |
|
Filing 10
STANDING ORDER RE FINAL PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCES FOR CIVIL JURY TRIALS by Judge George H. Wu. (lom)
|
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Skinsation LA, Inc. (lh) |
| Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge George H. Wu and Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (lh) |
| Filing 5 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by August Image, LLC. (Doniger, Stephen) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff August Image, LLC, (Doniger, Stephen) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff August Image, LLC. (Doniger, Stephen) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff August Image, LLC. (Doniger, Stephen) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-35216900 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff August Image, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Attorney Stephen M. Doniger added to party August Image, LLC(pty:pla))(Doniger, Stephen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
