Victoria Dillihunt v. Temple Mount et al
Victoria Dillihunt |
Temple Mount, The Dame of the Rock, Social Security, Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. Army Force and Department of the Air Force |
2:2023cv03247 |
April 28, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Charles F Eick |
Fernando M Olguin |
Margo A Rocconi |
John F Walter |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 Mail Returned addressed to Victoria Dillihunt re Notice of Assignment to United States Judges(CV-18) - optional html form #4 (rolm) |
Filing 14 Mail Returned addressed to Victoria Dillihunt re Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program (ADR-8) - optional html form #5 (rolm) |
Filing 13 Mail Returned addressed to Victoria Dillihunt re Order on Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60),, #11 . (vam) |
Filing 12 Mail Returned addressed to Victoria Dillihunt re Notice of Clerical Error (G-11), #10 . (vam) |
Filing 11 ORDER by Judge Fernando M. Olguin: Denying #3 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis: IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: As explained in the attached statement, the Request is DENIED because: The action is frivolous or malicious. The action fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that: As explained in the attached statement, because it is absolutely clear that the deficiencies in the complaint cannot be cured by amendment, this case is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (bm) |
Filing 10 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Upon further review, a determination has been made that this case was incorrectly assigned by the clerk. Pursuant to General Order 05-07, this complaint is appropriate for review and issuance of a report and recommendation by a United States Magistrate Judge. Therefore, the case has been reassigned to District Judge Fernando Olguin and Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi. The case will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:23-cv-03247 FMO(MAR). (rn) |
Filing 9 ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 21-01 (Related Case) filed. Transfer of case declined by Judge Cormac J. Carney, for the reasons set forth on this order. Related Case No. 2:2-cv-08516 CJC(MARx) (rn) |
Filing 8 SELF-REPRESENTATION ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. (iv) |
Filing 7 STANDING ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge John F. Walter. (iv) |
Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John F. Walter and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (sh) |
Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Victoria Dillihunt. (sh) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Victoria Dillihunt, (sh) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendants Department of Health and Human Services, Department of the Air Force, Social Security, Temple Mount, The Dame of the Rock, U.S. Army Force.Case assigned to Judge John F. Walter for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick.Jury Demanded., filed by Plaintiff Victoria Dillihunt. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (sh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.