Nicholas J. McInerny v. Red Robin International Inc. et al
| NICHOLAS J. MCINERNY, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated and Nicholas J. McInerny |
| RED ROBIN INTERNATIONAL, INC. WHICH WILL DO BUSINESS IN CALIFORNIA AS RED ROBIN BURGER SPIRITS EMPORIUMS, a Nevada Corporation, Red Robin International, Inc. and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
| 2:2023cv03338 |
| May 2, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Patricia Donahue |
| John F Walter |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
SCHEDULING AND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. The purpose of this Order is to notify the parties and their counsel of the deadlines and the schedule that will govern this action. Pretrial Conference set for 11/8/2024 at 8:00 AM. Hearing on Motions in Limine; Disputed Jury Instructions set for 11/15/2024 at 8:00 AM. Jury Trial set for 11/26/2024 at 8:30 AM. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. (iv)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER VACATING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE, REFERRAL TO PRIVATE MEDIATION, and DISMISSING ANY UNSERVED DOE DEFENDANTS by Judge John F. Walter. The Court has reviewed the parties' Joint Rule 26(f) Report and finds that a Scheduling Conference is not necessary. The hearing on June 26, 2023 is vacated and taken off calendar. A Scheduling and Case Management Order will issue. Any unserved DOE defendants are dismissed at this time. The Court, having considered the parties Request: ADR Procedure Selection, the Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program, or the report submitted by the parties pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) and Civil L.R. 26-1, hereby orders this case referred to: ADR Procedure No. 3: Private mediation. The ADR proceeding is to be completed no later than: February 5, 2024. (iv)
|
| Filing 12 JOINT RULE 26(f) REPORT REPORT filed by Plaintiff Nicholas J. McInerny. (Hawkins, James) |
| Filing 11 Notice of Related Cases and Notice of Pendency of other Action or Procedure filed by defendant Red Robin International, Inc.. (Siegel, Adam) |
|
Filing 10
MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) COURT ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. Counsel are hereby notified that a Scheduling Conference has been set for June 26, 2023 at 1:15 p.m. before Judge John F. Walter in Courtroom 7A, 350 W. 1st St, Los Angeles, CA 90012. Lead Trial Counsel shall attend all proceedings before this Court, including the Scheduling Conference. Counsel are directed to comply with Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 26-1 in a timely fashion and to file a Joint Report, on or before June 9, 2023. (iv)
|
|
Filing 9
STANDING ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge John F. Walter. (iv)
|
| Filing 8 TEXT ONLY ENTRY ORDER DISMISSING DOES: Pursuant to Local Rule 19-1, no complaint or petition shall be filed that includes more than ten Doe or fictitiously named parties. Accordingly, the Court hereby dismisses the action as to Doe Defendants 11 through 50, inclusive.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (sr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John F. Walter and Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue. (sh) |
| CONFORMED E-FILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint filed by Defendant Red Robin International, Inc.[FILED IN STATE COURT 05/01/2023 SUBMITTED AS ATTACHMENT NO. 3 EXHIBIT C TO THE NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ](sh) |
| CONFORMED E-FILED COPY OF CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT against Defendants Does, Red Robin International, Inc. Jury Demanded., filed by Plaintiff Nicholas J. McInerny.[FILED IN STATE COURT 03/23/2023 SUBMITTED AS ATTACHMENT NO. 2 EXHIBIT A TO THE NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ] (sh) |
| Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant RED ROBIN INTERNATIONAL, INC. WHICH WILL DO BUSINESS IN CALIFORNIA AS RED ROBIN BURGER SPIRITS EMPORIUMS, a Nevada Corporation identifying Red Robin Gourmet Burgers Inc., a publicly traded company as Corporate Parent. (Vigodnier, Martin) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants RED ROBIN INTERNATIONAL, INC. WHICH WILL DO BUSINESS IN CALIFORNIA AS RED ROBIN BURGER SPIRITS EMPORIUMS, a Nevada Corporation, identifying Red Robin International, Inc., a Nevada Corporation; Nicholas J. Mcinerny. (Vigodnier, Martin) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant RED ROBIN INTERNATIONAL, INC. WHICH WILL DO BUSINESS IN CALIFORNIA AS RED ROBIN BURGER SPIRITS EMPORIUMS, a Nevada Corporation. (Vigodnier, Martin) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 23STCV06410 Receipt No: ACACDC-35243307 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant RED ROBIN INTERNATIONAL, INC. WHICH WILL DO BUSINESS IN CALIFORNIA AS RED ROBIN BURGER SPIRITS EMPORIUMS, a Nevada Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Kelly Mcgrew, #2 Declaration Declaration of Jared Kulka, #3 Declaration Declaration of Adam Y. Siegel) (Attorney Martin Vigodnier added to party RED ROBIN INTERNATIONAL, INC. WHICH WILL DO BUSINESS IN CALIFORNIA AS RED ROBIN BURGER SPIRITS EMPORIUMS, a Nevada Corporation(pty:dft))(Vigodnier, Martin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
