Lindsay Orin v. Cal. Del. U.S.A. Inc. et al
| Lindsay Orin |
| Cal. Del. U.S.A. Inc. and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
| 2:2023cv03404 |
| May 4, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Fernando M Olguin |
| Karen L Stevenson |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO CONTINUE RULE 26 CONFERENCE IN LIGHT OF MEDIATION #11 by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. *See Order for Details.* (iv)
|
| Filing 11 STIPULATION to Continue RULE 26 CONFERENCE IN LIGHT OF MEDIATION from July 6, 2023 to November 3, 2023 Re: Initial Order Setting R26 Scheduling Conference - form only #10 filed by Defendant Cal. Del. U.S.A. Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Lewis, Bryanne) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 6/22/2023. Scheduling Conference set for 7/6/2023 at 10:00 AM before Judge Fernando M. Olguin. (gga)
|
| Filing 9 Notice of Compliance With 28 USC Sec. 1446(d) re Removal filed by Defendant Cal. Del. U.S.A. Inc.. (Sternberg, Elyssa) |
| Filing 8 TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Chambers of Judge Fernando M. Olguin. This matter has been assigned to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin. The Court refers counsel to the Court's Initial Standing Order found on the Court's Website under Judge Olguin's Procedures and Schedules. Please read this Order carefully. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (gga) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant Cal. Del. U.S.A. Inc..(Sternberg, Elyssa) |
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin and Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. (et) |
| CONFORMED E-FILED COPY OF CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT against Defendants Cal. Del. U.S.A. Inc., Does 1 through 10, inclusive. Jury Demanded., filed by Plaintiff Lindsay Orin. [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 4/3/2023 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO EXHIBIT A TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ]. (et) |
| Filing 3 Defendant's NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Cal. Del. U.S.A. Inc., identifying An. Del U.S.A.. (Lewis, Bryanne) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Cal. Del. U.S.A. Inc.. (Lewis, Bryanne) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 23STCV07181 with filing fee previously paid ($402.00 paid on 05/04/2023, receipt number ACACDC-35254669), filed by Defendant Cal. Del. U.S.A. Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Class and Collective Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Summons, #3 Exhibit C - Civil Case Cover Sheet, #4 Exhibit D - ADR Information Package, #5 Exhibit E - First Amended General Order, #6 Exhibit F - Voluntary Efficient Litigation Stip, #7 Exhibit G - Stipulations Early Organizational Meeting, #8 Exhibit H - Stipulation Discovery Resolution, #9 Exhibit I- Initial Status Conference Order - Complex Class Actions, #10 Exhibit J- Order Pursuant to CCP 1054, #11 Exhibit K- Notice of Case Assignment, #12 Exhibit L- Notice of Entry of Judgment or Order) (Attorney Bryanne Lewis added to party Cal. Del. U.S.A. Inc.(pty:dft))(Lewis, Bryanne) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
