Joseph Randolph Mays v. Brian Birkholz
| Joseph Randolph Mays |
| Brian Birkholz |
| 2:2023cv03427 |
| May 4, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Pedro V Castillo |
| Stephen V Wilson |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER: (1) DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE; AND (2) DIRECTING THE COURT CLERK TO UPDATE PETITIONER'S ADDRESS OF RECORD by Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo, re: Order to Show Cause #5 . The Court takes judicial notice of the Notice of Change of Address filed in the Civil Rights Action and DISCHARGES the OSC in the instant habeas action. (see document for further details) (hr)
|
| Filing 6 Mail Returned addressed to Joseph Randolph Mays re Order to Show Cause #5 (hr) |
|
Filing 5
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE SHOULD NOT RECOMMEND THAT THIS ACTION BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE A CURRENT ADDRESS by Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. Petitioner is therefore ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, within fourteen days of the date of this Order, why this action should not be dismissed pursuant to Local Rule 41-6 for Petitioner's failure to provide a current address. (see document for further details) (Attachments: #1 Blank Notice of Dismissal Form) (hr)
|
| Filing 4 Mail Returned addressed to Joseph Randolph Mays RegNo43487-007 re Notice of Reference to US Magistrate Judge (CV-84) (Habeas Corpus) - optional html form, #3 (aco) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Stephen V. Wilson and referred to Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (sh) |
| Filing 2 DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS filed by Petitioner Joseph Randolph Mays. (sh) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In Federal Custody (28:2241) Case assigned to Judge Stephen V. Wilson and referred to Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo.(Filing fee $ 5 FEE DUE), filed by Petitioner Joseph Randolph Mays. (sh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Joseph Randolph Mays v. Brian Birkholz | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Joseph Randolph Mays | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Brian Birkholz | |
| Represented By: | Assistant 2241-194 US Attorney LA-CV |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
