David Robinson et al v. Quest Diagnostics, Inc.
Plaintiff: David Robinson and Nina Robinson
Defendant: Quest Diagnostics, Inc., Quest Diagnostics Incorporated a Delaware corporation doing business as Quest Diagnostics and DOES 1 through 15, inclusive
Case Number: 2:2023cv03453
Filed: May 5, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 31, 2023 Filing 3 Application for Refund of Fees filed by Defendant Quest Diagnostics Incorporated (Mann, Craig)
May 8, 2023 Filing 2 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to incorrect intra-district venue selected by the filer. Case is transferred to the Southern Division. Case has been assigned to Judge John W. Holcomb for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to John D. Early. New Case Number 8:23-cv-00803 JWH (JDEx). (jtil)
May 5, 2023 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of California, case number 30-2023-01315380-CU-MM-CJC Receipt No: BCACDC-35264211 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Quest Diagnostics, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit EXHIBIT 1, #2 Exhibit EXHIBIT 2, #3 Exhibit EXHIBIT 3, #4 Exhibit EXHIBIT 4, #5 Exhibit EXHIBIT 5, #6 Exhibit EXHIBIT 6, #7 Exhibit EXHIBIT 7, #8 Civil Cover Sheet, #9 Notice of Interested Parties, #10 Declaration, #11 Certificate of Service) (Attorney Craig T Mann added to party Quest Diagnostics, Inc.(pty:dft))(Mann, Craig)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: David Robinson et al v. Quest Diagnostics, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Robinson
Represented By: Vikki Vanderwoude
Represented By: Mark A. Finkelstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nina Robinson
Represented By: Vikki Vanderwoude
Represented By: Mark A. Finkelstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Quest Diagnostics, Inc.
Represented By: Craig T Mann
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Quest Diagnostics Incorporated a Delaware corporation doing business as Quest Diagnostics
Represented By: Adriana Katzen
Represented By: Amanda Mae Kidd
Represented By: Craig T Mann
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOES 1 through 15, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?