Kimberly Lamb et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
Plaintiff: KIMBERLY LAMB and LELAND RICHARD BARNETT
Defendant: COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES and Does 1 through 20, inclusive
Case Number: 2:2023cv03479
Filed: May 8, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Maria A Audero
Referring Judge: Josephine L Staton
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 2 by Judge Josephine L. Staton. Case ordered to Court Mediation Panel for mediation. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than 5/31/2024. (vv)
July 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 14 CIVIL TRIAL ORDER by Judge Josephine L. Staton. (vv)
June 29, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MINUTES (In Chambers) SCHEDULING ORDER by Judge Josephine L. Staton: The Court has reviewed the parties' Joint Rule 26(f) Report. (Doc. #10 .) and sets thefollowing schedule. Last Day to File a Motion to Add Parties or Amend Pleadings: 8/25/2023. Fact Discovery Cutoff: 3/29/2024. Last Day to File Motions (Excluding Daubert Motions and all other Motions in Limine): 4/12/2024. Last Day to Serve Initial Expert Reports: 4/12/2024. Last Day to Serve Rebuttal Expert Reports: 5/10/2024. Expert Discovery Cutoff: 6/7/2024. Last Day to Conduct Settlement Proceedings: 5/31/2024. Last Day to File Daubert Motions: 6/14/2024. Last Day to File Motions in Limine: 11/1/2024. Final Pretrial Conference set for 11/22/2024 at 10:30 AM. (See document for further information). (jp)
June 29, 2023 Filing 12 TEXT ENTRY (IN CHAMBERS) SCHEDULING NOTICE VACATING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Josephine L. Staton: The Court, on its own motion, hereby VACATES the Scheduling Conference set for June 30, 2023. The Court will issue a separate Scheduling Order pursuant to the parties Joint 26(f) Report. No appearances are necessary. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (vv)
June 14, 2023 Filing 11 STIPULATION for Protective Order filed by Defendant County of Los Angeles. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Kelly, Lenore)
June 7, 2023 Filing 10 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 5-7 Days, filed by Plaintiffs Leland Richard Barnett, Kimberly Lamb.. (Carrillo, Luis)
May 15, 2023 Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant County of Los Angeles.(Kelly, Lenore)
May 9, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Josephine L. Staton. Scheduling Conference set for 6/30/2023 at 10:30 AM before Judge Josephine L. Staton. (vv)
May 9, 2023 Filing 7 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON. (vv)
May 9, 2023 Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh)
May 9, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh)
May 9, 2023 Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. (lh)
May 8, 2023 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants County of Los Angeles, Does. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Leland Richard Barnett. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 4/4/2023 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh)
May 8, 2023 Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, (Kelly, Lenore)
May 8, 2023 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. (Kelly, Lenore)
May 8, 2023 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 23NWCV01050 Receipt No: ACACDC-35269104 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B) (Attorney Lenore Cabreros Kelly added to party COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES(pty:dft))(Kelly, Lenore)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kimberly Lamb et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: KIMBERLY LAMB
Represented By: Michael S Carrillo
Represented By: Laura Marie Jimenez
Represented By: Luis Allen Carrillo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: LELAND RICHARD BARNETT
Represented By: Michael S Carrillo
Represented By: Laura Marie Jimenez
Represented By: Luis Allen Carrillo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
Represented By: Lenore Cabreros Kelly
Represented By: Laura Inlow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 20, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?