California Spine and Neurosurgery Institute v. Sanmina Corporation et al
| California Spine and Neurosurgery Institute |
| Sanmina Corporation and DOES 1-10 |
| 2:2023cv03562 |
| May 10, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Maria A Audero |
| R Gary Klausner |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 Notice of Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
SCHEDULING NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES AND ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge R. Gary Klausner: On the Court's own motion, the Scheduling Conference set for 7/3/2023 is hereby CONTINUED TO 7/17/2023, at 09:00 AM before Judge R. Gary Klausner. Counsel shall appear on this new date and time. SO ORDERED.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (jre) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 12 AMENDED DOCUMENT filed by Defendant Sanmina Corporation. Amendment to Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties,, #3 (Ernster, Shannon) |
| Filing 11 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 3 days, filed by Defendant Sanmina Corporation.. (Ernster, Shannon) |
| Filing 10 Notice Confirming Notification to State Court of Removal filed by Defendant Sanmina Corporation. (Ernster, Shannon) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge R. Gary Klausner. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 6/26/2023. Scheduling Conference set for 7/3/2023 at 09:00 AM before Judge R. Gary Klausner. (jre)
|
|
Filing 8
STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge R. Gary Klausner. (jre)
|
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge R. Gary Klausner and Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. (jtil) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint filed by Defendant California Spine and Neurosurgery Institute in Los Angeles Superior Court on 5/9/2023, attached at Exhibit C.(jtil) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff California Spine and Neurosurgery Institute in Los Angeles Superior Court on 4/5/2023, attached as Exhibit A. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Sanmina Corporation, re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties,, #3 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 served on 05/10/23. (Ernster, Shannon) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Sanmina Corporation, identifying Defendant Sanmina Corporation; Aetna Life Insurance Company, non-party Claims Administrator of the self-funded health benefit plan sponsored by Sanmina Corporation; Aetna, Inc., parent of Aetna Life Insurance Company; CVS, ultimate parent of Aetna, Inc.; Healthcare Ally Management of California, LLC, Plaintiff; California Spine and Neurosurgery Institute, Plaintiff. (Attorney Courtney C Hill added to party Sanmina Corporation(pty:dft))(Hill, Courtney) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Sanmina Corporation. (Ernster, Shannon) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 23STCV07644 Receipt No: ACACDC-35288013 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Sanmina Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Declaration ISO Removal) (Attorney Shannon Lissa Ernster added to party Sanmina Corporation(pty:dft))(Ernster, Shannon) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
