Sako Bala v. Qatar Airways et al
| Sako Bala |
| Qatar Airways, a Corporation, Qatar Airways and Does 1 to 10 |
| 2:2023cv03632 |
| May 11, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha |
| Jean P Rosenbluth |
| Airplane |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Qatar Airways. (et) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (et) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Sako Bala. (Mgdesyan, George) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Sako Bala. (Mgdesyan, George) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Sako Bala, identifying Qatar Airways, a Corporation. (Mgdesyan, George) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-35300293 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Sako Bala. (Attorney George G. Mgdesyan added to party Sako Bala(pty:pla))(Mgdesyan, George) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
