Vanessa Amaya v. Nissan North America, Inc. et al
| Vanessa Amaya |
| Nissan North America, Inc. |
| 2:2023cv03660 |
| May 12, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal -- Other Contract |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error Docket Entries No. 5 - Notice of Assignment, No. 6 - Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program and No. 7 - Notice to Counsel were inadvertently docketed to the wrong casenumber. Please refer to case 5:23-cv-00875 SSS (SHKx). Re: Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program (ADR-8) - optional html form #6 , Notice to Counsel Re: Consent to Proceed before a US Magistrate Judge - optional html form #7 , Notice of Assignment to United States Judges(CV-18) - optional html form #5 (lh) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes and Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (lh) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to incorrect intra-district venue selected by the filer. Case is transferred to the Eastern Division. Case has been assigned to Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to Shashi H. Kewalramani. New Case Number 5:23-cv-00875 SSS (SHKx). (lh) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Nissan North America, Inc., identifying Nissan Motor Co., Ltd.. (Salas, Rodrigo) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Nissan North America, Inc.. (Salas, Rodrigo) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Riverside County Superior Court, case number CVRI2301584 Receipt No: ACACDC-35305094 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Nissan North America, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Rodrigo E. Salas, #2 Exhibit A - Complaint - file endorsed, #3 Exhibit B - Nissan's Answer to Complaint - file endorsed, #4 Exhibit C - Nissan's Statement and Designation by Foreign Corporation, #5 Exhibit D - Nissan's entity details) (Attorney Rodrigo E Salas added to party Nissan North America, Inc.(pty:dft))(Salas, Rodrigo) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Vanessa Amaya v. Nissan North America, Inc. et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Vanessa Amaya | |
| Represented By: | Kevin Y Jacobson |
| Represented By: | Daniel Nickfardjam |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Nissan North America, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Rodrigo E Salas |
| Represented By: | Abigail Hudson |
| Represented By: | Amir M Nassihi |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
