Paul H. Kim v. Alexander Yu
| Paul H Kim and Paul H. Kim |
| Alexander Yu |
| 2:2023cv03669 |
| May 12, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Charles F Eick |
| Fernando M Olguin |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 7/13/2023. Scheduling Conference set for 7/27/2023 at 10:00 AM before Judge Fernando M. Olguin. (gga)
|
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Alexander Yu, identifying Joanne Y. Kim, Plaintiff's ex-wife. (Ruttenberg, Kenneth) |
| Filing 15 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant Alexander Yu.(Attorney Kenneth Gary Ruttenberg added to party Alexander Yu(pty:dft))(Ruttenberg, Kenneth) |
| Filing 14 TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Chambers of Judge Fernando M. Olguin. This matter has been assigned to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin. The Court refers counsel to the Court's Initial Standing Order found on the Court's Website under Judge Olguin's Procedures and Schedules. Please read this Order carefully. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (gga) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Paul H. Kim, upon Defendant Alexander Yu served on 5/25/2023, answer due 6/15/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Employee in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Han, Chris) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Docket Entries No. 5 - Notice of Assignment, No. 6 - Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program, No.7 - Notice to Counsel were not properly served via Notice of Electronic Filing. In order to fix the errordocuments will be re-docket. Re: Notice to Counsel Re: Consent to Proceed before a US Magistrate Judge - optional html form #7 (lh) |
| Filing 12 CORRECTED Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 11 CORRECTED NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 10 CORRECTED NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (lh) |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Alexander Yu. (lh) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (lh) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Paul H Kim. (Han, Chris) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Paul H Kim, (Han, Chris) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Paul H Kim. (Han, Chris) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-35306589 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Paul H Kim. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Note, #2 Exhibit Notice of Default, #3 Exhibit POS re Notice of Default) (Attorney Chris Han added to party Paul H Kim(pty:pla))(Han, Chris) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
