Faymin Chen v. Amazon.com Services LLC et al
Plaintiff: Faymin Chen
Defendant: Amazon.com Services LLC, Aston Carter, Inc., Aerotek, Inc. and Does 1-50, inclusive
Case Number: 2:2023cv03704
Filed: May 15, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 16, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to incorrect intra-district venue selected by the filer. Case is transferred to the Southern Division. Case has been assigned to Judge Fred W. Slaughter for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to Douglas F. McCormick. New Case Number 8:23-cv-0858 FWS (DFMx). (ghap)
May 15, 2023 Filing 4 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Amazon.com Services LLC, re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Corporate Disclosure Statement #3 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 served on 05/15/2023. (Bajaj, Jaya)
May 15, 2023 Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT (FRCP 7.1) AND CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED ENTITIES filed by Defendant Amazon.com Services LLC (Bajaj, Jaya)
May 15, 2023 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Amazon.com Services LLC. (Bajaj, Jaya)
May 15, 2023 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County Superior Court, case number 30-2023-01317819-CU-WT-CJC Receipt No: ACACDC-35314577 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Amazon.com Services LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Jaya Bajaj, #2 Exhibit A - Complaint, #3 Exhibit B - Answer to Complaint, #4 Exhibit C - Amazon Sales Inc SOS) (Attorney Jaya Bajaj added to party Amazon.com Services LLC(pty:dft))(Bajaj, Jaya)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Faymin Chen v. Amazon.com Services LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Faymin Chen
Represented By: Vincent Calderone
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Amazon.com Services LLC
Represented By: Jaya Bajaj
Represented By: Idrian Mollaneda
Represented By: Douglas Evans Dexter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Aston Carter, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Aerotek, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-50, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?