My Hale v. Macys et al
| My Hale |
| Macys and Does 1-10 |
| 2:2023cv03782 |
| May 15, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Pedro V Castillo |
| R Gary Klausner |
| Consumer Credit |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER by Judge R. Gary Klausner DENYING REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support #6 . This case is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated.) See Order for further details. (jp)
|
|
Filing 7
STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge R. Gary Klausner. (jre)
|
| Filing 5 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge R. Gary Klausner and Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. (sh) |
| Filing 6 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff My Hale. (sh) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff My Hale, (sh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendants Does, Macys. Case assigned to Judge R. Gary Klausner for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. Jury Demanded., filed by Plaintiff My Hale. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (sh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
