Los Angeles Waterkeeper v. U.S. Borax, Inc.
| Los Angeles Waterkeeper |
| U.S. Borax, Inc. |
| 2:2023cv03784 |
| May 17, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jean P Rosenbluth |
| Hernan D Vera |
| Environmental Matters |
| 33 U.S.C. ยง 1365 Environmental Matters |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT filed by Plaintiff Los Angeles Waterkeeper (Lozeau, Michael) |
Filing 16
REASSIGNMENT ORDER by Judge Hernan D. Vera: Please refer to Order for complete details. (cbr)
|
| Filing 15 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to U.S. Borax, Inc. answer now due 7/31/2023, filed by Defendant U.S. Borax, Inc..(Attorney Steven Edward Soule added to party U.S. Borax, Inc.(pty:dft))(Soule, Steven) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER OF THE CHIEF JUDGE (#23-070) approved by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Pursuant to the recommended procedure adopted by the Court for the CREATION OF CALENDAR of Judge Hernan D. Vera, this case is transferred from Judge Dolly M. Gee to the calendar of Judge Hernan D. Vera for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:23-cv-03784-HDV-JPRx. (rn)
|
| Filing 13 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (30 day),, #12 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days). In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (gk) |
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed Los Angeles Waterkeeper, upon Defendant U.S. Borax, Inc. served on 5/30/2023, answer due 6/29/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by unspecified means. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by unspecified means. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by unspecified means. Service was executed in compliance with statute not specified. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. Original Summons returned. (Lozeau, Michael) |
| Filing 11 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant U.S. Borax, Inc. (lom) |
|
Filing 10
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (kti)
|
| Filing 9 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Los Angeles Waterkeeper. (Lozeau, Michael) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #2 . The following error(s) was found: The date and signature line must be left blank. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (ghap) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Los Angeles Waterkeeper. (Lozeau, Michael) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Los Angeles Waterkeeper, (Lozeau, Michael) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Los Angeles Waterkeeper. (Lozeau, Michael) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-35333177 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff Los Angeles Waterkeeper. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A to Complaint) (Attorney Michael R Lozeau added to party Los Angeles Waterkeeper(pty:pla))(Lozeau, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Los Angeles Waterkeeper v. U.S. Borax, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Los Angeles Waterkeeper | |
| Represented By: | Michael R Lozeau |
| Represented By: | Barak Kamelgard |
| Represented By: | Benjamin Avi Harris |
| Represented By: | Victoria Yundt |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: U.S. Borax, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Steven Edward Soule |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
