Epic Games, Inc. v. Activision Blizzard, Inc.,
| Epic Games, Inc. |
| Activision Blizzard, Inc., |
| 2:2023cv03792 |
| May 17, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of New Case Number and Judge Assignment by Clerk. This case is hereby converted from case type CV to case type MC because the incorrect case type was used at case opening. A new case number has therefore been assigned to this case. District Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth are assigned to this new case number. All future documents must be filed under the new case number, which is 2:23-mc-00068 SB (JPRx). The previous case number, 2:23-cv-03792, is hereby terminated. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Petitioner Epic Games, Inc., re Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 Proof of Personal Service of Petition for Order Compelling Compliance with Deposition Subpoena on Third Party Activision Blizzard, Inc. and accompanying documents served on 05/18/2023. (Korn, Adam) |
| Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Epic Games, Inc.'s Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Petitioner Epic Games, Inc. identifying N/A as Corporate Parent. (Korn, Adam) |
| Filing 3 Epic Games, Inc.'s Certificate and Notice of Interested Parties CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Petitioner Epic Games, Inc., identifying Epic Games, Inc., and Tencent Holdings. (Korn, Adam) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Petitioner Epic Games, Inc.. (Korn, Adam) |
| Filing 1 PETITION Epic Games, Inc.'s Petition for Order Compelling Compliance of Deposition Subpoena on Third Party Activision Blizzard, Inc. in Case Pending in Foreign Jurisdiction Receipt No: ACACDC-35334288 - Fee: $402, filed by Petitioner Epic Games, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Adam B. Korn in Support of Epic Games, Inc.'s Petition for Order Compelling Compliance of Deposition Subpoena on Third Party Activision Blizzard, Inc.in Case Pending in Foreign Jurisdiction, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H, #10 Proposed Order Proposed Order Compelling Compliance with Deposition Subpoena on Third Party Activision, Inc. in Case Pending in Foreign Jurisdiction) (Attorney Adam B. Korn added to party Epic Games, Inc.(pty:pet))(Korn, Adam) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Epic Games, Inc. v. Activision Blizzard, Inc., | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Epic Games, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Adam B. Korn |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Activision Blizzard, Inc., | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
