LFG Payments, Inc. v. Christian Smith
| LFG Payments, Inc. |
| Christian Smith and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive |
| 2:2023cv03802 |
| May 18, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Charles F Eick |
| Josephine L Staton |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 Notice of Removal |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
Notice filed by Defendant Christian Smith. (Notice of Filing of Notice to State Court re Notice of Removal of Action) (Rapoport, Gregg)
|
|
Filing 3
CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Christian Smith. (Rapoport, Gregg)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Christian Smith, identifying Christian Smith; LFG Payments, Inc.. (Rapoport, Gregg)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 22STCV35450 Receipt No: BCACDC-35335383 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Christian Smith. (Attachments: #1 Appendix Indexed Copy of State Court Filings in Support of Notice of Removal of Action (Part 1 of 2), #2 Appendix Indexed Copy of State Court Filings in Support of Notice of Removal of Action (Part 2 of 2), #3 Declaration Declaration of Gregg A. Rapoport in Support of Notice of Removal) (Attorney Gregg A. Rapoport added to party Christian Smith(pty:dft))(Rapoport, Gregg)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
