Barry Cole et al v. Xerox Corporation et al
| Barry Cole |
| XEROX CORPORATION, a corporation and Xerox Corporation |
| DOES 1 through 10, inclusive |
| 2:2023cv03846 |
| May 18, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Andre Birotte |
| Rozella A Oliver |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 19
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO SET MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION AND RELATED DEADLINES by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: The Court APPROVES the parties' Stipulation #16 and hereby ORDERS that Plaintiff must file his motion for class certification by 6/21/2024. Defendant must file its opposition by 8/2/2024. Plaintiff must file his reply by 8/23/2024. The hearing it set for 9/20/2024 at 10:00 AM. (gk)
|
|
Filing 18
ORDER RE: JURY/COURT TRIAL: I. SCHEDULE; II. TRIAL PREPARATION; III. CONDUCT OF ATTORNEYS AND PARTIES by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: In a concurrently-issued Order, the Court is approving the parties' stipulation to set a schedule for Plaintiff's anticipated class certification motion. The Court also sets 6/7/2024 as the last date for a motion to amend pleadings/add party. As all other proposed deadlines would be after the class certification motion, the Court will defer setting a full schedule until after the class certification motion is resolved. The parties are ORDERED to file a proposed schedule within 14 days of the issuance of the class certification order. See document for further details. (gk)
|
|
Filing 17
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: The Court has reviewed the Joint Rule 26(f) Report submitted by the parties, and determines that an in-person Scheduling Conference is unnecessary. Accordingly, the Court VACATES the July 14, 2023, Scheduling Conference. Order re Jury/Court Trial to issue. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cb) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 16 First STIPULATION to Certify Class filed by Plaintiff Barry Cole. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO SET MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION AND RELATED DEADLINES)(Gaines, Daniel) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Barry Cole, identifying Barry Cole. (Gaines, Daniel) |
| Filing 14 STATUS REPORT JOINT RULE 26(f) REPORT filed by Plaintiff Barry Cole. (Gaines, Daniel) |
| Filing 13 Notice of Filing Removal of Civil Action in State Court filed by Defendant Xerox Corporation. (Brown, Janice) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. Scheduling Conference set for 7/14/2023 at 10:00 AM before Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb)
|
|
Filing 11
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb)
|
| Filing 10 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andre Birotte Jr and Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (car) |
| Filing 7 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant XEROX CORPORATION, a corporation, re Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #6 , Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel (G-123), #4 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel (G-123), #3 , Corporate Disclosure Statement #5 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),,, #1 served on May 18, 2023. (Brown, Janice) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant XEROX CORPORATION, a corporation, identifying Xerox Holdings Corporation. (Brown, Janice) |
| Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant XEROX CORPORATION, a corporation identifying Xerox Holdings Corporation as Corporate Parent. (Brown, Janice) |
| Filing 4 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Janice P Brown counsel for Defendant XEROX CORPORATION, a corporation. Adding Janine M. Braxton as counsel of record for Xerox Corporation for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Xerox Corporation. (Brown, Janice) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Janice P Brown counsel for Defendant XEROX CORPORATION, a corporation. Adding Janice P. Brown as counsel of record for Xerox Corporation for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Xerox Corporation. (Brown, Janice) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant XEROX CORPORATION, a corporation. (Brown, Janice) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 23STCV06525 with filing fee previously paid (402.00 paid on 5/18/2023, receipt number 35342661), filed by Defendant XEROX CORPORATION, a corporation. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Summons, #3 Civil Case Cover Sheet, #4 Notice of Case Assignment, #5 ADR Packet, #6 General Order, #7 Voluntary Efficient Litigation Stipulation, #8 Order, #9 Order, #10 Initial Status Conference Order, #11 Notice of Entry of Order, #12 Notice and Acknowledgment of Receipt - Civil, #13 Notice of Entry of Order, #14 Answer to Complaint, #15 Joint Stipulation to File First Amended Complaint, #16 Joint Case Management Report, #17 Brown Declaration, #18 Caminiti Declaration, #19 Statement of Information) (Attorney Janice P Brown added to party XEROX CORPORATION, a corporation(pty:dft))(Brown, Janice) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
