Rebeka Rodriguez v. Harley-Davidson Motor Company, Inc. et al
| Rebeka Rodriguez |
| Harley-Davidson Motor Company, Inc. a Wisconsin corporation d/b/a www.harley-davidson.com, DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,, Harley-Davidson Motor Company, Inc. a Wisconsin corporation doing business as www.harley-davidson.com and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
| 2:2023cv03931 |
| May 22, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 22 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Compel Arbitration filed by defendant Harley-Davidson Motor Company, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 8/18/2023 at 01:30 PM before Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Proposed Order) (Ho, Thi) |
Filing 21
ORDER APPROVING STIPULATED REQUEST FOR FURTHER CONTINUANCE OF DEFENDANT'S DEADLINE TO FILE RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT FROM JUNE 27, 2023 TO JULY 11, 2023 #20 by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (lc)
|
| Filing 20 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to July 11, 2023 re Complaint - (Discovery), filed by defendant Harley-Davidson Motor Company, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Ho, Thi) |
|
Filing 19
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED REQUEST FOR FURTHER CONTINUANCE OF DEFENDANT'S DEADLINE TO FILE RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT TO JUNE 27, 2023 #18 by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (lc)
|
| Filing 18 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to June 27, 2023 re Complaint - (Discovery), filed by defendant Harley-Davidson Motor Company, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Ho, Thi) |
|
Filing 17
ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Theodore W. Seitz to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Harley-Davidson Motor Company, Inc. for defendant Harley-Davidson Motor Company, Inc.and designating Thi Hoang Ho as local counsel #16 by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (lc)
|
| Filing 16 Corrected APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Theodore W. Seitz to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Harley-Davidson Motor Company, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500.00 Previously Paid on 6/1/2023, Receipt No. ACACDC-35413997) filed by defendant Harley-Davidson Motor Company, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order on Application of Non-Resident Attorney to Appear In A Specific Case Pro Hac Vice) (Ho, Thi) |
| Filing 15 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN FILED DOCUMENT RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Theodore W. Seitz to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Harley-Davidson Motor Company, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-35413997) #12 by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. The document is stricken. (lc) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Theodore W. Seitz to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Harley-Davidson Motor Company, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-35413997) #12 . The following error(s) was/were found: Case information is incomplete. DJ and MJ initials missing on application and proposed order. Please note DJ and MJ Notice of Assignment, dated 5/23/23, Dkt. 3. (lt) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION REQUESTING CONTINUANCE OF DEFENDANTS DEADLINE TO FILE RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT FROM MAY 30, 2023 TO JUNE 13, 2023 #11 by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (lc) Modified on 6/1/2023 (lc).
|
| Filing 12 (STRICKEN PER 6/7/2023 COURT'S G112B RESPONSE DOCKET NO. 15). APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Theodore W. Seitz to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Harley-Davidson Motor Company, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-35413997) filed by defendant Harley-Davidson Motor Company, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order on Application of Non-Resident Attorney to Appear In A Specific Case Pro Hac Vice) (Ho, Thi) Modified on 6/7/2023 (lc). |
| Filing 11 Joint STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to 06/13/2023 re Complaint - (Discovery), filed by defendant Harley-Davidson Motor Company, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Ho, Thi) |
|
Filing 10
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER STRIKING STIPULATION (DKT. #9 ) by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: The court STRIKES the parties' Stipulation Regarding Request For Continuance Of Defendant's Deadline To File Response To Complaint for failure to attest on the signature page of the document that all other signatories listed, who electronically signed with a "s" and on whose behalf the filing is submitted, concur in the content of and have authorized the filing. See Local Rule 5-4.3.4. Any renewed stipulation must comply with all applicable statutes and Local Rules. Failure to comply with all applicable statutes and Local Rules in any renewed stipulation, including Local Rule 5-4.3.4, may result in the denial of the stipulation with prejudice. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (tf) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 9 (STRICKEN ON MAY 26, 2023; SEE CM/ECF NO. 10) Joint STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to 06/13/2023 re Complaint - (Discovery), filed by defendant Harley-Davidson Motor Company, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Ho, Thi) Modified on 5/26/2023 (tf). |
|
Filing 8
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (tf)
|
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Harley-Davidson Motor Company, Inc., (Ho, Thi) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (et) |
| Filing 5 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (et) |
| CONFORMED E-FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Harley-Davidson Motor Company, Inc., Does 1 through 10, inclusive, filed by Plaintiff Rebeka Rodriguez. [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 3/2/2023 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO EXHIBIT A TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ]. (et) |
| NON-CONFORMED COPY OF NOTICE AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Rebeka Rodriguez, upon Defendant Harley-Davidson Motor Company, Inc. acknowledgment sent by Plaintiff on 3/31/2023, answer due 4/21/2023. Acknowledgment of Service signed by Thi Hoang Ho, Defendant Harley-Davidson Motor Company, Inc. [SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO EXHIBIT A TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ]. (et) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Harley-Davidson Motor Company, Inc.. (Ho, Thi) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 23STCV04660 Receipt No: ACACDC-35357108 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Harley-Davidson Motor Company, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Attorney Thi Hoang Ho added to party Harley-Davidson Motor Company, Inc.(pty:dft))(Ho, Thi) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
