Jiawen Li v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
Jiawen Li |
UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services Nebraska Service Center, Director Ur Mendoza Jaddou and Ur Mendoza Jaddou |
2:2023cv03960 |
May 23, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Jacqueline Chooljian |
Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong |
Other Immigration Actions |
08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Ur Mendoza Jaddou answer now due 8/30/2023; United States Citizenship and Immigration Services Nebraska Service Center answer now due 8/30/2023; United States Citizenship and Immigration Services answer now due 8/30/2023, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendants Ur Mendoza Jaddou; United States Citizenship and Immigration Services Nebraska Service Center; United States Citizenship and Immigration Services.(Attorney Erin Choi added to party Ur Mendoza Jaddou(pty:dft), Attorney Erin Choi added to party United States Citizenship and Immigration Services(pty:dft), Attorney Erin Choi added to party United States Citizenship and Immigration Services Nebraska Service Center(pty:dft))(Choi, Erin) |
Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Jiawen Li, upon Defendant All Defendants. Service of the Summons and Complaint were Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A)(Shu, Han) |
Filing 8 TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong. This matter has been assigned to District Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong. The Court refers counsel to the Court's Initial Standing Order found on the Court's website under Judge Frimpong's Procedures and Schedules. Please read the Standing Order carefully. It is the responsibilities of the parties to maintain familiarly with the Standing Order and any future amendments that the Court may issue by periodically checking the Court's website for the operative version of the Standing Order. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (kd) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 7 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Ur Mendoza Jaddou, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services Nebraska Service Center. (lh) |
Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (lh) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 filed by plaintiff Jiawen Li. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Attachment #1)(Shu, Han) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff All Plaintiffs, (Shu, Han) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Jiawen Li. (Shu, Han) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-35363045 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff Jiawen Li. (Attorney Han Shu added to party Jiawen Li(pty:pla))(Shu, Han) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.