Jason Giandomenico v. City of Hawthorne et al
Plaintiff: Jason Giandomenico
Defendant: City of Hawthorne and Does 1-10
Case Number: 2:2023cv04079
Filed: May 25, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Michael W Fitzgerald
Referring Judge: Alexander F MacKinnon
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 13 AMENDED ORDER RE JURY TRIAL by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. Last Day to Add Parties/Amend Pleadings 11/20/2023. Non-expert Discovery Cut-off 5/10/2024. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. (iv)
July 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER RE JURY TRIAL by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. Last Day to Add Parties/Amend Pleadings 11/20/2023. Non-expert Discovery Cut-off 6/7/2023. Last Day to Hear Motions 6/10/2024. File Memorandum of Contentions of Fact and Law, Exhibit and Witness Lists, Status Report regarding settlement, and all Motions in Limine 8/5/2024. Final Pretrial Conference and Hearing on Motions in Limine set for 8/26/2024 at 11:00 AM. Trial Date (Est. 5 Days) set for 9/17/2024 at 8:30 AM. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. (iv)
July 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 2 by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. Case ordered to Court Mediation Panel for mediation. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than 6/28/2024. (iv)
June 30, 2023 Filing 10 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan by the Parties ; estimated length of trial 5-7 days, filed by Defendant City of Hawthorne.. (Parker, Chandler)
June 21, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 SCHEDULING NOTICE and ORDER by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald: On 5/30/2023, the Court issued an Order Setting Scheduling Conference #8 ("Order"). Pursuant to that Order, the parties' Joint Rule 26(f) Report (the "Report") was due on or before 6/20/2023, and the Scheduling Conference was set for 7/3/2023 at 11:00 a.m. The required Report has not been filed. The Court VACATES the Scheduling Conference and no appearances shall be made. The Court ORDERS the parties to file the required Joint Rule 26(f) Report including a completed worksheet (Exhibit A to the Order) with agreed-upon dates -- no later than 7/3/2023. The Court will then issue pretrial and trial dates. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (smom) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
May 30, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. Scheduling Conference set for 7/3/2023 at 11:00 AM. (lom)
May 26, 2023 Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): Attachments No. 3 Civil Cover Sheet should not have been attached to Docket Entry No. 1. Each document should have been filed separately. You are not required to take any action to correct this deficiency unless the Court so directs. (lh)
May 26, 2023 Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh)
May 26, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh)
May 26, 2023 Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. (lh)
May 25, 2023 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants City of Hawthorne, Does. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Jason Giandomenico. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 12/15/2022 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh)
May 25, 2023 Filing 3 ANSWER to Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 Complaint filed by Defendant City of Hawthorne.(Parker, Chandler)
May 25, 2023 Filing 2 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant City of Hawthorne, (Parker, Chandler)
May 25, 2023 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles, case number 22STCV39037 Fee Exemption in accordance with statute, filed by Defendant City of Hawthorne. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Summons, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Attorney Chandler Adrian Parker added to party City of Hawthorne (pty:dft))(Parker, Chandler)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jason Giandomenico v. City of Hawthorne et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jason Giandomenico
Represented By: Robert C Moest
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Hawthorne
Represented By: Chandler Adrian Parker
Represented By: Tomas A Guterres
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?