Generation Genius, Inc. v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
| Generation Genius, Inc. |
| JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. |
| 2:2023cv04152 |
| May 30, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Alexander F MacKinnon |
| Fernando M Olguin |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO ARBITRATE AND STAY ACTION #14 by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. The case is STAYED pending completion of the arbitration proceedings. The Clerk shall administratively close the case. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated) (iv)
|
| Filing 14 STIPULATION to Stay Case pending Arbitration filed by Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Sasso, Marcos) |
| Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Generation Genius, Inc., upon Defendant Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon CT Corporation System, Authorized Agent for Service of Process in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity (Attachments: #1 Supplement POS of Initial Standing Order)(Schulz, Harry) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 8/10/2023. Scheduling Conference set for 8/24/2023 at 10:00 AM before Judge Fernando M. Olguin. (gga)
|
| Filing 11 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. answer now due 7/21/2023, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A..(Attorney Marcos Daniel Sasso added to party JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.(pty:dft))(Sasso, Marcos) |
| Filing 10 TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Chambers of Judge Fernando M. Olguin. This matter has been assigned to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin. The Court refers counsel to the Court's Initial Standing Order found on the Court's Website under Judge Olguin's Procedures and Schedules. Please read this Order carefully. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (gga) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (et) |
| Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin and Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. (et) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Notice of Related Case(s) #3 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #4 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #2 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Generation Genius, Inc.. (Schulz, Harry) |
| Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Generation Genius, Inc.. (Schulz, Harry) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Plaintiff Generation Genius, Inc.. Related Case(s): none (Schulz, Harry) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Generation Genius, Inc., identifying none. (Schulz, Harry) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-35394693 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Generation Genius, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A) (Attorney Harry J Schulz, III added to party Generation Genius, Inc.(pty:pla))(Schulz, Harry) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
