Clifton Walker v. Joseph Helman et al
| Clifton Walker |
| Joseph Helman and Does 1 to 10 |
| 2:2023cv04162 |
| May 30, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Charles F Eick |
| Mark C Scarsi |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Joseph Helman. (et) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Mark C. Scarsi and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (et) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff CLIFTON WALKER. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff CLIFTON WALKER, (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff CLIFTON WALKER. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: BCACDC-35397840 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff CLIFTON WALKER. (Attorney Jason J Kim added to party CLIFTON WALKER(pty:pla))(Kim, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
