Xiaoyan Hu v. Alejandro N. Mayorkas et al
Xiaoyan Hu |
Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou and David M. Radel |
2:2023cv04180 |
May 30, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Sherilyn Peace Garnett |
Jean P Rosenbluth |
Other Immigration Actions |
08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Oil Appellate counsel for Defendants Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro N. Mayorkas, David M. Radel. Filed by Defendants Mayorkas et al.. (Attorney Oil Appellate added to party Ur M. Jaddou(pty:dft), Attorney Oil Appellate added to party Alejandro N. Mayorkas(pty:dft), Attorney Oil Appellate added to party David M. Radel(pty:dft))(Appellate, Oil) |
Filing 11 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel (G-123),, #10 . The following error(s) was/were found: Section I of Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel incomplete; missing name of party on the G123 form. Case number incomplete; missing initials of Judge In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ak) |
Filing 10 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Nancy Naseem Safavi counsel for Defendants Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro N. Mayorkas, David M. Radel. Adding Nancy Safavi as counsel of record for Mayorkas, Alejandro N Sec DHS; Jaddou, Ur M Dir USCIS et al for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Nancy Safavi. (Attorney Nancy Naseem Safavi added to party Ur M. Jaddou(pty:dft), Attorney Nancy Naseem Safavi added to party Alejandro N. Mayorkas(pty:dft), Attorney Nancy Naseem Safavi added to party David M. Radel(pty:dft))(Safavi, Nancy) |
Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Xiaoyan Hu, upon Defendant Ur M. Jaddou served on 6/5/2023, answer due 8/4/2023; Alejandro N. Mayorkas served on 6/5/2023, answer due 8/4/2023; David M. Radel served on 6/5/2023, answer due 8/4/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit delivered confirmation, #2 Exhibit summons)(Wang, Justin) |
Filing 8 STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett. (pg) |
Filing 7 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro N. Mayorkas, David M. Radel. (lh) |
Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (lh) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Xiaoyan Hu, (Wang, Justin) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Xiaoyan Hu. (Wang, Justin) |
Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Xiaoyan Hu. (Wang, Justin) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-35400362 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff Xiaoyan Hu. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Attorney Justin X Wang added to party Xiaoyan Hu(pty:pla))(Wang, Justin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.